Comparison of CT angiography with conventional arterial angiography in aortoiliac occlusive disease

This study compared the results of conventional and CT angiography of the aortoiliac segment in 35 patients with occlusive disease. Disease severity was graded into five categories. Two assessors independently assessed the segment from the distal abdominal aorta to the proximal superficial femoral artery and a consensus was formed. There was interobserver agreement in 87% of segments for conventional angiography and in 78% for CT angiography. Comparison of the two modalities gave identical grading in 84% of segments. Dissimilar grading was found in 16%, with a roughly equal number of undergrading and overgrading. CT angiography has the advantages of being minimally invasive, requiring only an intravenous injection of contrast medium and imaging surrounding soft tissues. Multiplanar reconstruction aids the visualization of asymmetrical stenoses, and collateral blood supply is readily appreciated. However, CT angiography may fail to demonstrate short stenoses owing to limited z-axis resolution.