Comparative seismic RISK assessment of existing RC buildings using seismic vulnerability index approach

被引:14
|
作者
Kassem, Moustafa Moufid [1 ]
Nazri, Fadzli Mohamed [1 ]
Farsangi, Ehsan Noroozinejad [2 ]
Tan, Chee Ghuan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Civil Engn, Nibong Tebal 14300, Penang, Malaysia
[2] Grad Univ Adv Technol, Fac Civil & Surveying Engn, Kerman, Iran
[3] Univ Malaya, Dept Civil Engn, Fac Engn, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
关键词
Seismic Vulnerability Index (SVI); Parametric Analysis; Vulnerability Classes; Fragility Curves; Nonlinear Analysis; CITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.032
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The implementation of seismic risk management is becoming increasingly important all over the world, and especially in East-Asia as the structures aging surpass. In this context, three existing reinforced concrete buildings located in Malaysia have been selected for seismic vulnerability assessment. This work aims to apply the Seismic Vulnerability Index (SVI) via a Non-Linear Parametric Analysis (NL-PA) for each of the 3 RC existing buildings having different storey levels and clusters; low-rise (BLR), mid-rise (BMR), and high-rise (BHR). This approach can be achieved by undertaking a NL-PA as an analytical strategy instead of the empirical approach, which relies primarily on physical vulnerability parameters, earthquake-resistant design (ERD), and engineering demand parameters (EDP) by simulating a set of seismic records that can define the fragility features. The assessed SVI values for three different clusters of buildings are obtained for Far-Field (FF) and Near-Field (NF) seismic scenarios. With regards to the non-linear static analysis (NL-SA), the SVI values interact very well with the findings acquired from the NL-DA which are in good compliance with the low-rise building, in contrast for the two mid-and high-rise buildings. According to the obtained probabilistic vulnerability curves, the reference buildings are classified to be in D2 and D3 damage grades with dominancy of D3 level for the mid-rise and high-rise structures.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 913
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment indices for the seismic vulnerability of existing RC buildings
    Thermou, G. E.
    Pantazopoulou, S. J.
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2011, 40 (03): : 293 - 313
  • [2] Seismic assessment of existing RC buildings
    Fardis, MN
    Panagiotakos, TB
    Biskinis, D
    Kosmopoulos, A
    [J]. SEISMIC ASSESSMENT AND REHABILITATION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS, 2003, 29 : 215 - 244
  • [3] An alternative approach for the seismic rehabilitation of existing RC buildings using seismic isolation
    Cardone, Donatello
    Flora, Amedeo
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2016, 45 (01): : 91 - 111
  • [4] Seismic vulnerability assessment of existing school buildings
    Domaneschi, Marco
    Noori, Ali Zamani
    Pietropinto, Maria Vittoria
    Cimellaro, Gian Paolo
    [J]. COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2021, 248
  • [5] Preliminary assessment approach to predict seismic vulnerability of existing low and mid-rise RC buildings
    Hakan Dilmaç
    [J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 18 : 3101 - 3133
  • [6] A performance based approach for the seismic assessment and rehabilitation of existing RC buildings
    Negro, Paolo
    Mola, Elena
    [J]. BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2017, 15 (08) : 3349 - 3364
  • [7] A performance based approach for the seismic assessment and rehabilitation of existing RC buildings
    Paolo Negro
    Elena Mola
    [J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 15 : 3349 - 3364
  • [8] A new strategy for the seismic assessment of existing RC buildings
    Cosenza, E
    Manfredi, G
    Verderame, GM
    [J]. ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2002, 45 (06) : 817 - 831
  • [9] Seismic vulnerability assessment of RC buildings with setback irregularity
    Mouhine, Mohamed
    Hilali, Elmokhtar
    [J]. AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [10] Seismic vulnerability assessment of existing precast industrial buildings
    Valente, Marco
    [J]. BUILDING MATERIALS AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING II, 2013, 743 : 63 - 66