Approaches to approximation reducts in inconsistent decision tables

被引:0
|
作者
Mi, JS [1 ]
Wu, WZ
Zhang, WX
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Fac Sci, Inst Informat & Syst Sci, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Normal Univ, Coll Math & Informat Sci, Hebei 050016, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Ocean Univ, Informat Coll, Zhoushan 316004, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this paper, two new concepts of lower approximation reduction and upper approximation reduction are introduced. Lower approximation reduction is the smallest attribute subset that preserves the lower approximations of all decision classes, and upper approximation reduction is the smallest attribute subset that preserves the upper approximations of all decision classes. For an inconsistent DT, an upper approximation consistent set must be a lower approximation consistent set, but the converse is not true. For a consistent DT, they are equivalent. After giving their equivalence definitions, we examine the judgement theorem and discernibility matrices associated with the two reducts, from which we can obtain approaches to knowledge reduction in inconsistent decision tables.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 286
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Approximation reduction in inconsistent incomplete decision tables
    Qian, Yuhua
    Liang, Jiye
    Li, Deyu
    Wang, Feng
    Ma, Nannan
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2010, 23 (05) : 427 - 433
  • [2] Approximate distribution reducts in inconsistent interval-valued ordered decision tables
    Du, Wen Sheng
    Hu, Bao Qing
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2014, 271 : 93 - 114
  • [3] Relative reducts in consistent and inconsistent decision tables of the Pawlak rough set model
    Miao, D. Q.
    Zhao, Y.
    Yao, Y. Y.
    Li, H. X.
    Xu, F. F.
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2009, 179 (24) : 4140 - 4150
  • [4] Reducts in incomplete decision tables
    Li, RP
    Huang, D
    [J]. ADVANCED DATA MINING AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3584 : 165 - 174
  • [5] Decision trees and reducts for distributed decision tables
    Moshkov, MJ
    [J]. MONITORING, SECURITY, AND RESCUE TECHNIQUES IN MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS, 2005, : 239 - 248
  • [6] Finding reducts for ordinal decision tables
    Lee, JWT
    Wang, XZ
    Wang, JF
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2005 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-9, 2005, : 3143 - 3147
  • [7] Three Approaches to Deal with Inconsistent Decision Tables - Comparison of Decision Tree Complexity
    Azad, Mohammad
    Chikalov, Igor
    Moshkov, Mikhail
    [J]. ROUGH SETS, FUZZY SETS, DATA MINING, AND GRANULAR COMPUTING, 2013, 8170 : 46 - 54
  • [8] Classification for Inconsistent Decision Tables
    Azad, Mohammad
    Moshkov, Mikhail
    [J]. ROUGH SETS, (IJCRS 2016), 2016, 9920 : 525 - 534
  • [9] On partial tests and partial reducts for decision tables
    Moshkov, MJ
    Piliszczuk, M
    [J]. ROUGH SETS, FUZZY SETS, DATA MINING, AND GRANULAR COMPUTING, PRT 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3641 : 149 - 155
  • [10] Three Approaches to Deal with Tests for Inconsistent Decision Tables - Comparative Study
    Azad, Mohammad
    Chikalov, Igor
    Moshkov, Mikhail
    Zielosko, Beata
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS ON ROUGH SETS XIX, 2015, 8988 : 38 - 50