Traditional health practitioners and sustainable development: a case study in South Africa

被引:7
|
作者
Street, R. A. [1 ,2 ]
Smith, M. [3 ,4 ]
Moshabela, M. [5 ]
Shezi, B. [1 ]
Webster, C. [1 ]
Falkenberg, T. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] South African Med Res Council, Environm & Hlth Res Unit, Durban, South Africa
[2] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Nursing & Publ Hlth, Discipline Occupat & Environm Hlth, Durban, South Africa
[3] Univ Mississippi, Natl Ctr Nat Prod Res, Oxford, MS USA
[4] Western Sydney Univ, Natl Inst Complementary Med, Penrith, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Nursing & Publ Hlth, Discipline Rural Hlth, Durban, South Africa
[6] Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Res Grp Integrat Care, Huddinge, Sweden
[7] Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Ctr Social Sustainabil, Huddinge, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Indigenous medicine; Traditional health practitioners; Health policy; South Africa; HEALERS; CARE; MEDICINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.puhe.2018.07.021
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: To highlight legal and regulatory advances relating to South African traditional health practitioners (THPs) over the past 10 years and discuss the implications for the translation of health policies into guidelines for sustainable practice supporting public health. Study design: This is a rapid, structured literature review. Methods: A rapid, structured literature review was undertaken to identify relevant studies related to South African THPs involving a search of peer-reviewed literature from three databases and a grey literature internet search. The identified citations were screened, critically appraised, and narratively synthesized. Results: Efforts to regulate THPs in South Africa are underway; however, the lack of a regulatory framework for traditional practices is hampering progress. Several efforts to collaborate with THPs have been made over the years, many of which were not systematically evaluated and not based on principles of mutual respect. Existing collaborative examples need to be further supported by cost-effective evidence to suit the South African public health budget. Furthermore, small collaborative research efforts do not take into consideration the scale up of interventions. Conclusions: THPs in South Africa represent an important healthcare resource. However, the current policy environment does not support indicators to describe, monitor, and/or evaluate the role of THPs in the healthcare system. (c) 2018 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 5
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条