Budesonide once versus twice-daily administration: meta-analysis

被引:30
|
作者
Masoli, M
Weatherall, M
Holt, S
Beasley, R
机构
[1] Med Res Inst New Zealand, Perth, WA 6001, Australia
[2] Wellington Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Wellington, New Zealand
[3] P3 Res, Wellington, New Zealand
[4] Univ Southampton, Southampton, Hants, England
关键词
asthma; budesonide; compliance; meta-analysis; once daily;
D O I
10.1111/j.1440-1843.2004.00635.x
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of budesonide administered once daily compared to twice daily in asthma. Methodology: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing budesonide administered once versus twice a day that presented data on at least one clinical outcome measure was conducted. Results: A total of 10 studies, with 1922 children and adults with asthma, met the inclusion criteria. These studies were performed predominantly with mild to moderate asthmatic patients, using doses of budesonide ranging from 200 to 800 mu g per day There was no significant difference between daily dosing once or twice for all the clinical outcome variables, including withdrawals due to asthma, for which the odds ratio was 1.0 (95% confidence interval, 0.65-1.52). Conclusions: In mild to moderate asthma a once-daily budesonide regimen has a similar efficacy to a twice-daily regimen in doses up to 800 mu g per day. A once-daily regimen has potential advantages in terms of patient compliance and satisfaction, when used in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 534
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Budesonide once versus twice daily administration: Meta-analysis
    Masoli, M
    Weatherall, M
    Beasley, R
    [J]. THORAX, 2003, 58 : 44 - 44
  • [2] Efficacy of once-daily versus twice-daily administration of budesonide by Turbuhaler® in children with stable asthma
    Möller, C
    Strömberg, L
    Oldaeus, G
    Arweström, E
    Kjellman, M
    [J]. PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 1999, 28 (05) : 337 - 343
  • [3] Once-Daily Versus Twice-Daily Tacrolimus Formulations in Kidney Transplantation Recipients: A Meta-Analysis
    Hu, A.
    Tai, Q.
    He, X.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 12 : 410 - 410
  • [4] ONCE-DAILY VERSUS TWICE-DAILY ADMINISTRATION OF CEFTAZIDIME IN THE PRETERM INFANT
    VANDENANKER, JN
    SCHOEMAKER, RC
    VANDERHEIJDEN, BJ
    BROERSE, HM
    NEIJENS, HJ
    DEGROOT, R
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1995, 39 (09) : 2048 - 2050
  • [5] Once-Daily versus Twice-Daily Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies
    Vadcharavivad, Somratai
    Saengram, Warangkana
    Phupradit, Annop
    Poolsup, Nalinee
    Chancharoenthana, Wiwat
    [J]. DRUGS, 2019, 79 (18) : 1947 - 1962
  • [6] Once-daily abacavir in place of twice-daily administration
    Goedken, AM
    Herman, RA
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2005, 39 (7-8) : 1302 - 1308
  • [7] Once-daily dosing with budesonide/formoterol compared with twice-daily budesonide/formoterol and once-daily budesonide in adults with mild to moderate asthma
    Kuna, P.
    Creemers, J. P. H. M.
    Vondra, V.
    Black, P. N.
    Lindqvist, A.
    Nihlen, U.
    Vogelmeier, C.
    [J]. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2006, 100 (12) : 2151 - 2159
  • [8] Once-daily versus twice-daily intravenous administration of vancomycin for infections in hospitalized patients
    Cohen, E
    Dadashev, A
    Drucker, M
    Samra, Z
    Rubinstein, E
    Garty, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 49 (01) : 155 - 160
  • [9] STEADY-STATE DISPOSITION OF DIFLUNISAL - ONCE-DAILY VERSUS TWICE-DAILY ADMINISTRATION
    MOJAVERIAN, P
    ROCCI, ML
    SWANSON, BN
    VLASSES, PH
    CHREMOS, AN
    LIN, JH
    YEH, JC
    FERGUSON, RK
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1985, 5 (06): : 336 - 339
  • [10] Candesartan cilexetil: Comparison of once-daily versus twice-daily administration for systemic hypertension
    Zuschke, CA
    Keys, I
    Munger, MA
    Carr, AA
    Marinides, GN
    Flanagan, TL
    Cushing, DJ
    Hayes, JL
    Michelson, EL
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1999, 21 (03) : 464 - 474