The Abnormal Phenomena of Entropy Weighting Method in the Dynamic Evaluation of Agricultural Water Conservation

被引:2
|
作者
Zhu, Liangzhen [1 ]
Xing, Xigang [2 ]
Yan, Feng [3 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Sch Hydrol & Water Resources, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Water Resources, Gen Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Planning &, Beijing 100120, Peoples R China
[3] Nanchang Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Nanchang 330031, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1155/2021/7732970
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Through a simple and intuitive example of the agricultural water conservation assessment in 3 provinces, China, the abnormal phenomena of the entropy weighting method (EWM) in the dynamic evaluation are revealed. The results show the following. (i) The irrigation water efficiency percentages (IWEPs) of these 3 provinces are improved from 53%, 53%, and 55% to 55%, 56%, and 56%, respectively. And their water-saving irrigation projects percentages (WSIPPs) are improved from 40%, 41%, and 41% to 42%, 42%, and 42%, respectively. However, their comprehensive agricultural conservation indices deteriorate from 52.11, 52.45, and 56.1 to 46.07, 46.74, and 48.57, respectively. (ii) EWM leads to the following paradox in the dynamic evaluation. All the indicators show improving trends, but the comprehensive evaluation results show a deteriorating trend. (iii) These abnormal phenomena of EWM are induced by that though all the indicators are improved, the discrimination of the worse indicators becomes larger while the discrimination of the better indicators becomes smaller. (iv) The abnormal phenomena of EWM in dynamic evaluation can be avoided by the trend analysis of the observation data and entropy values. When all the indicators have improvement trends, but the entropies of the better indicators are increasing and the entropies of the worse indicators are decreasing, EWM should not be used for assigning weights.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An abnormal phenomenon in entropy weight method in the dynamic evaluation of water quality index
    Zhe, Wang
    Xigang, Xing
    Feng, Yan
    [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 131
  • [2] An abnormal phenomenon in entropy weight method in the dynamic evaluation of water quality index
    Zhe, Wang
    Xigang, Xing
    Feng, Yan
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 131
  • [3] Improved Entropy Weighting Model in Water Quality Evaluation
    Yan Feng
    Yi Fanghui
    Chen Li
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2019, 33 : 2049 - 2056
  • [4] Improved Entropy Weighting Model in Water Quality Evaluation
    Yan Feng
    Yi Fanghui
    Chen Li
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2019, 33 (06) : 2049 - 2056
  • [5] An Evaluation of Regional FDI Quality based on Entropy Weighting Method and TOPSIS
    Zhao, Qiaozhi
    [J]. 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS AND INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 669 - 672
  • [6] The improved entropy weighting model in water quality evaluation based on the compound function
    Xi, Luo
    Qin, Zeng
    Feng, Yan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2022, 194 (09)
  • [7] The improved entropy weighting model in water quality evaluation based on the compound function
    Luo Xi
    Zeng Qin
    Yan Feng
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2022, 194
  • [8] Research on comprehensive evaluation method of distribution network based on AHP-entropy weighting method
    Liu, ZiWei
    Xie, QiongYao
    Dai, Lu
    Wang, HaiLiang
    Deng, Ling
    Wang, Chun
    Zhang, Yu
    Zhou, XiaoXia
    Yang, ChuYuan
    Xiang, Chuan
    Qin, SiYu
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 10
  • [9] Evaluation of Agricultural Extension Service for Sustainable Agricultural Development Using a Hybrid Entropy and TOPSIS Method
    Wang, Zhiguo
    Wang, Junbin
    Zhang, Guoping
    Wang, Zhixiong
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [10] Comprehensive power quality evaluation method of microgrid with dynamic weighting based on CRITIC
    Shi, Hongtao
    Li, Yifan
    Jiang, Zhongnan
    Zhang, Jie
    [J]. MEASUREMENT & CONTROL, 2021, 54 (5-6): : 1097 - 1104