HISTOMORPHOMETRIC BONE ASSESSMENT IN PATIENTS WITH FRACTURE OF THE PROXIMAL END OF THE FEMUR

被引:0
|
作者
De Souza, Caio Goncalves [1 ]
Goncalves De Souza, Marcio Passini [1 ]
Jorgetti, Vanda [2 ]
Dos Reis, Luciene Machado [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Lab Med Res LIM 16, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
来源
ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA | 2015年 / 23卷 / 02期
关键词
Bone and bones; Osteoporosis; Hip fractures; TRABECULAR BONE; TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; MINERAL DENSITY; HIP FRACTURE; FEMORAL-NECK; OSTEOPOROSIS; GEOMETRY; MEN; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1590/1413-78522015230201056
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To determine whether there is a difference on the bone architecture in patients with femoral neck fracture compared to patients with intertrochanteric fractures and assess the importance of aging on bone microarchitecture in patients with proximal femoral fracture. Methods: Biopsy of the iliac crest was made in seventeen patients between 55 and 90 years old who were admitted to the emergency room with fractures of the proximal end of the femur. After a small fragment was removed, we made a histomorphometric analysis of it. Results: There was no significant difference between patients with femoral neck fracture and trochanteric fracture in structural parameters, formation and resorption. Comparing age groups we also did not find any significant change between the groups in the parameters volume and trabecular separation. Conclusion: There are no difference in the morphometric parameters analyzed between the different types of fracture and age is not a significant factor in the alteration of these parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 106
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A HISTOMORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF OSTEOMALACIA IN ELDERLY FEMALES WITH FRACTURE OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR
    BERINGER, TRO
    [J]. ULSTER MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1985, 54 (02): : 148 - 154
  • [2] Pattern of bone loss of the proximal femur: A radiologic, densitometric, and histomorphometric study
    Kawashima, T.
    Uhthoff, H.K.
    [J]. 1600, (09):
  • [3] PATTERN OF BONE LOSS OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR - A RADIOLOGIC, DENSITOMETRIC, AND HISTOMORPHOMETRIC STUDY
    KAWASHIMA, T
    UHTHOFF, HK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1991, 9 (05) : 634 - 640
  • [4] Association between Singh Index and bone densitometry in patients with proximal femur fracture
    Machado, A. B. C.
    Corrente, J. E.
    Pereira, G. J. C.
    Morceli, J.
    Gumieiro, D. N.
    Dinhane, D. I.
    [J]. BONE, 2009, 44 (02) : S366 - S366
  • [5] Assessment of Bone Mineral Density in old age patients (> 60yrs) having proximal femur fracture
    Prajapati, Viral
    Prajapati, Pratik
    Patel, Prashant
    Kakani, Ketan
    Patil, Sandeep
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCE, 2016, 4 (03): : 275 - 277
  • [6] BONE MASS, MUSCLE FUNCTION AND FRACTURE OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR
    COOPER, C
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 1989, 42 (04) : 277 - 280
  • [7] Bone density in patients with previous osteoporotic fracture of proximal femur and risk of consecutive osteoporotic fracture.
    Vyskocil, V.
    Pavelka, T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2006, 21 : S425 - S425
  • [8] Proximal femur fracture
    Seekamp, A.
    [J]. TRAUMA UND BERUFSKRANKHEIT, 2009, 11 : 107 - 111
  • [9] Osteocyte density and histomorphometric parameters in cancellous bone of the proximal femur in five mammalian species
    Mullender, MG
    Huiskes, R
    Versleyen, H
    Buma, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1996, 14 (06) : 972 - 979
  • [10] A Statistical Model of Shape and Bone Mineral Density Distribution of the Proximal Femur for Fracture Risk Assessment
    Whitmarsh, Tristan
    Fritscher, Karl D.
    Humbert, Ludovic
    Del Rio Barquero, Luis Miguel
    Roth, Tobias
    Kammerlander, Christian
    Blauth, Michael
    Schubert, Rainer
    Frangi, Alejandro F.
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION (MICCAI 2011), PT II, 2011, 6892 : 393 - +