Comparative Analysis of On-Board Methane and Methanol Reforming Systems Combined with HT-PEM Fuel Cell and CO2 Capture/Liquefaction System for Hydrogen Fueled Ship Application

被引:18
|
作者
Lee, Hyunyong [1 ,2 ]
Jung, Inchul [1 ]
Roh, Gilltae [1 ]
Na, Youngseung [3 ]
Kang, Hokeun [2 ]
机构
[1] Korean Register, R&D Div, 36 Myeongji Ocean City 9 Ro, Busan 46762, South Korea
[2] Korea Maritime & Ocean Univ, Div Marine Syst Engn, 727 Taejong Ro, Busan 49112, South Korea
[3] Univ Seoul, Dept Mech & Informat Engn, Seoulsiripdaero 163, Seoul 02504, South Korea
关键词
steam methane reforming; steam methanol reforming; electrical efficiency; exergy efficiency; LNG; COMPARATIVE EXERGY ANALYSIS; STEAM; CAPTURE; POWER; PERFORMANCE; GAS; COMBUSTION; OPTIONS; MEA; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.3390/en13010224
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study performs energetic and exergetic comparisons between the steam methane reforming and steam methanol reforming technologies combined with HT-PEMFC and a carbon capture/liquefaction system for use in hydrogen-fueled ships. The required space for the primary fuel and captured/liquefied CO2 and the fuel cost have also been investigated to find the more advantageous system for ship application. For the comparison, the steam methane reforming-based system fed by LNG and the steam methanol reforming-based system fed by methanol have been modeled in an Aspen HYSYS environment. All the simulations have been conducted at a fixed W-net, (electrical) (475 kW) to meet the average shaft power of the reference ship. Results show that at the base condition, the energy and exergy efficiencies of the methanol-based system are 7.99% and 1.89% higher than those of the methane-based system, respectively. The cogeneration efficiency of the methane-based system is 7.13% higher than that of the methanol-based system. The comparison of space for fuel and CO2 storage reveals that the methanol-based system requires a space 1.1 times larger than that of the methane-based system for the total voyage time, although the methanol-based system has higher electrical efficiency. In addition, the methanol-based system has a fuel cost 2.2 times higher than that of the methane-based system to generate 475 kW net of electricity for the total voyage time.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] ON-BOARD HYDROGEN FOR HIGH TEMPERATURE PEM FUEL CELL STACK BY METHANE AND METHANOL STEAM REFORMING
    Kolavennu, Panini
    Das, Susanta K.
    Berry, K. Joel
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUEL CELL SCIENCE, ENGINEERING, AND TECHNOLOGY - 2008, 2008, : 447 - 451
  • [2] Process analysis of a molten carbonate fuel cell on-board application to reduce vessel CO2 emissions
    Bosio, Barbara
    Archetti, Maurizio
    Audasso, Emilio
    Bove, Dario
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 2023, 190
  • [3] Design, modelling and techno-economic analysis of a solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine system with CO2 capture fueled by gases from steel industry
    Rao, M.
    Fernandes, A.
    Pronk, P.
    Aravind, P. V.
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 148 : 1258 - 1270