Trial of the Primary Care Practice Improvement Tool: building organisational performance in Australian general practice and primary health care

被引:8
|
作者
Crossland, Lisa [1 ]
Upham, Susan J. [1 ]
Janamian, Tina [1 ]
Siskind, Victor [2 ]
Sheehan, Mary [2 ]
Jackson, Claire L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Discipline Gen Practice, Ctr Res Excellencee Bldg Primary Care Qual Perfor, Via Res Cocreat, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Psychol & Counselling, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; INDICATORS; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; RESOURCES;
D O I
10.5694/mja16.00121
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To nationally trial the Primary Care Practice Improvement Tool (PC-PIT), an organisational performance improvement tool previously co-created with Australian primary care practices to increase their focus on relevant quality improvement (QI) activities. Design: The study was conducted from March to December 2015 with volunteer general practices from a range of Australian primary care settings. We used a mixed-methods approach in two parts. Part 1 involved staff in Australian primary care practices assessing how they perceived their practice met (or did not meet) each of the 13 PC-PIT elements of high-performing practices, using a 1-5 Likert scale. In Part 2, two external raters conducted an independent practice visit to independently and objectively assess the subjective practice assessment from Part 1 against objective indicators for the 13 elements, using the same 1-5 Likert scale. Concordance between the raters was determined by comparing their ratings. In-depth interviews conducted during the independent practice visits explored practice managers' experiences and perceived support and resource needs to undertake organisational improvement in practice. Results: Data were available for 34 general practices participating in Part 1. For Part 2, independent practice visits and the inter-rater comparison were conducted for a purposeful sample of 19 of the 34 practices. Overall concordance between the two raters for each of the assessed elements was excellent. Three practice types across a continuum of higher-to lower-scoring practices were identified, with each using the PC-PIT in a unique way. During the in-depth interviews, practice managers identified benefits of having additional QI tools that relate to the PC-PIT elements. Conclusions: The PC-PIT is an organisational performance tool that is acceptable, valid and relevant to our range of partners and the end users (general practices). Work is continuing with our partners and end users to embed the PC-PIT in existing organisational improvement programs.
引用
收藏
页码:S15 / S21
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Primary Care Practice Improvement Tool (PC-PIT) process for organisational improvement in primary care: application by Australian Primary Health Networks
    Borg, Samantha J.
    Crossland, Lisa
    Risk, Jo
    Porritt, Julie
    Jackson, Claire L.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2019, 25 (02) : 185 - 191
  • [2] Health promotion by primary care nurses in Australian general practice
    Keleher, Helen
    Parker, Rhian
    [J]. COLLEGIAN, 2013, 20 (04) : 215 - 221
  • [3] Primary health care ICD -: A tool for general practice research
    Pärnänen, H
    Kumpusalo, E
    Takala, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, 15 (02): : 133 - 148
  • [4] A complexity perspective on health care improvement and reform in general practice and primary health care
    Booth, Barbara J.
    Zwar, Nicholas
    Harris, Mark
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2010, 16 (01) : 29 - 35
  • [5] Improving quality in general practice using the Primary Care Practice Improvement Tool (PC-PIT) with Primary Health Network support
    Borg, Samantha J.
    Donald, Maria
    Totsidis, Koula
    Quinn, Narelle
    Jackson, Claire L.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2020, 26 (06) : 484 - 491
  • [6] General Practice and Primary Health Care in Denmark
    Pedersen, Kjeld Moller
    Andersen, John Sahl
    Sondergaard, Jens
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2012, 25 : S34 - S38
  • [7] General practice or primary care?
    Church, D
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 1999, 49 (438): : 67 - 67
  • [8] The Australian Primary Care Collaboratives: an Australian general practice success story
    Ford, Dale R.
    Knight, Andrew W.
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2010, 193 (02) : 90 - 91
  • [9] GENERAL-PRACTICE OR PRIMARY HEALTH-CARE
    MARKS, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS, 1989, 39 (318): : 1 - 2
  • [10] GENERAL-PRACTICE IN PRIMARY HEALTH-CARE
    URLEP, F
    VOLJC, B
    [J]. ZDRAVSTVENI VESTNIK, 1984, 53 (05): : 197 - 200