The "peer-review" process in biomedical journals: characteristics of "Elite" reviewers

被引:4
|
作者
Alfonso, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Clin San Carlos, Inst Cardiovasc, Unidad Hemodinam & Cardiol Intervencionista, Madrid, Spain
来源
NEUROLOGIA | 2010年 / 25卷 / 09期
关键词
Biomedical Journals; Characteristics of "Elite" reviewers; Peer-review; REVISTA-ESPANOLA; QUALITY; PUBLICATION; EDITORS; RECOMMENDATIONS; CARDIOLOGIA; EXPERIENCE; AUTHORS; IMPACT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.nrl.2010.05.006
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The "peer-review" system is used to improve the quality of submitted scientific papers and provides invaluable help to the Editors in their decision-making process. The "peer-review" system remains the cornerstone of the scientific process and, therefore, its quality should be closely monitored. The profile of the "elite" reviewers has been described, but further studies are warranted to better identify their main characteristics. A major challenge, not only for Editors but also for medical scientific societies as a whole, is to continue to guarantee the excellence in the "peer-review" process and to ensure that it receives adequate academic recognition. (C) 2010 Sociedad Espanola de Neurologia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 529
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PEER-REVIEW OF MANUSCRIPTS FOR BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS
    LEGENDRE, AM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 207 (01) : 36 - 38
  • [2] Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals
    Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
    Kitas, George D.
    [J]. CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (04) : 386 - 389
  • [3] A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
    Ketevan Glonti
    Daniel Cauchi
    Erik Cobo
    Isabelle Boutron
    David Moher
    Darko Hren
    [J]. BMC Medicine, 17
  • [4] Perspectives on involvement in the peer-review process: surveys of patient and public reviewers at two journals
    Schroter, Sara
    Price, Amy
    Flemyng, Ella
    Demaine, Andrew
    Elliot, Jim
    Harmston, Rebecca R.
    Richards, Tessa
    Staniszewska, Sophie
    Stephens, Richard
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (09):
  • [5] Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study
    Glonti, Ketevan
    Hren, Darko
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (10):
  • [6] A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
    Glonti, Ketevan
    Cauchi, Daniel
    Cobo, Erik
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Moher, David
    Hren, Darko
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2019, 17 (1)
  • [7] Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process
    Jim Giles
    [J]. Nature, 2006, 439 : 252 - 252
  • [8] Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process
    Giles, J
    [J]. NATURE, 2006, 439 (7074) : 252 - 252
  • [9] A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
    Glonti, Ketevan
    Cauchi, Daniel
    Cobo, Erik
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Moher, David
    Hren, Darko
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (10):
  • [10] Reviewing Manuscripts for Peer-Review Journals: A Primer for Novice and Seasoned Reviewers
    Lovejoy, Travis I.
    Revenson, Tracey A.
    France, Christopher R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2011, 42 (01) : 1 - 13