共 50 条
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide hydrofluoroalkane nasal aerosol, 80 or 160 μg once daily, for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis
被引:16
|作者:
Ratner, Paul
[1
]
Jacobs, Robert
[2
]
Mohar, Dale
[3
]
Huang, Holly
[4
]
Desai, Shailesh Y.
[4
]
Hinkle, Joseph
[4
]
机构:
[1] Sylvana Res Associates, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[2] Biogenics Res Inst, San Antonio, TX USA
[3] Kerrville Res Associates, Kerrville, TX USA
[4] Sunov Pharmaceut Inc, Marlborough, MA USA
关键词:
DESISOBUTYRYL-CICLESONIDE;
FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE;
OCULAR SYMPTOMS;
SPRAY;
ADOLESCENTS;
DIAGNOSIS;
BURDEN;
POLLEN;
ADULTS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.anai.2010.09.024
中图分类号:
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号:
100102 ;
摘要:
Background: A hypotonic aqueous nasal spray of ciclesonide is indicated for the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). A new nasal aerosol formulation of ciclesonide containing a hydrofluoroalkane propellant delivered via a metered-dose inhaler (CIC-HFA) is currently in clinical development as a potential treatment for AR. Objectives: To study the efficacy and safety of once-daily administration of CIC-HFA 80 or 160 mu g compared with placebo in subjects 12 years and older with seasonal AR (SAR). Methods: Subjects 12 years and older with a >= 2-year history of SAR were randomized in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study to receive CIC-HFA 80 or 160 mu g or placebo once daily in the morning for 2 weeks. Changes from baseline in reflective total nasal symptom scores (rTNSSs), instantaneous TNSSs (iTNSSs), and reflective total ocular symptom scores (rTOSSs) in subjects with a baseline rTOSS of >= 5.00 were evaluated. Treatment-emergent adverse events were monitored throughout the study. Results: Seven hundred seven subjects were randomized. From baseline, CIC-HFA 80 or 160 mu g demonstrated 15.1% and 16.0% reductions in rTNSSs (P < .0001, 3.7% for placebo), 14.3% and 15.4% reductions in iTNSSs (P < .0001, 3.9% for placebo), and 15.7% and 15.0% reductions in rTOSSs (P < .001, 6.8% for placebo). The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was low and comparable between the CIC-HFA and placebo groups. Conclusions: In this study, once-daily treatment with CIC-HFA 80 or 160 mu g demonstrated statistically significant improvements in nasal and ocular symptoms of SAR. Both doses of active treatment were well tolerated. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010;105:471-479.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 479
页数:9
相关论文