Biodiversity loss, trophic skew and ecosystem functioning

被引:354
|
作者
Duffy, JE [1 ]
机构
[1] Coll William & Mary, Sch Marine Sci, Gloucester Point, VA 23062 USA
[2] Coll William & Mary, Virginia Inst Marine Sci, Gloucester Point, VA 23062 USA
关键词
biodiversity; conservation; ecosystem functioning; extinction; trophic structure;
D O I
10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00494.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Experiments testing biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning have been criticized on the basis that their random-assembly designs do not reflect deterministic species loss in nature. Because previous studies, and their critics, have focused primarily on plants, however, it is underappreciated that the most consistent such determinism involves biased extinction of large consumers, skewing trophic structure and substantially changing conclusions about ecosystem impacts that assume changing plant diversity alone. Both demography and anthropogenic threats render large vertebrate consumers more vulnerable to extinction, on average, than plants. Importantly, species loss appears biased toward strong interactors among animals but weak interactors among plants. Accordingly, available evidence suggests that loss of a few predator species often has impacts comparable in magnitude to those stemming from a large reduction in plant diversity. Thus, the dominant impacts of biodiversity change on ecosystem functioning appear to be trophically mediated, with important implications for conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:680 / 687
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: issues of scale and trophic complexity
    Raffaelli, David G.
    [J]. MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2006, 311 : 285 - 294
  • [2] Ecosystem functioning during biodiversity loss and recovery
    Clare, David S.
    Garcia, Clement
    Bolam, Stefan G.
    [J]. OIKOS, 2024, 2024 (09)
  • [3] Trade-offs between passive and trophic rewilding for biodiversity and ecosystem functioning
    Tanentzap, Andrew J.
    Daykin, Georgia
    Fennell, Thea
    Hearne, Ella
    Wilkinson, Matthew
    Carey, Peter D.
    Woodcock, Ben A.
    Heard, Matthew S.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2023, 281
  • [4] Trophic complementarity drives the biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationship in food webs
    Poisot, Timothee
    Mouquet, Nicolas
    Gravel, Dominique
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2013, 16 (07) : 853 - 861
  • [5] Ecosystem functioning and biodiversity
    Heip, C
    Brandt, A
    Gattuso, JP
    Antia, A
    Berger, WH
    Boissonnas, J
    Burkill, P
    d'Ozouvillel, L
    Graf, G
    Herndl, GJ
    Patching, J
    Reise, K
    Riou, G
    Simó, R
    Smetacek, V
    Wassmann, P
    [J]. MARINE SCIENCE FRONTIERS FOR EUROPE, 2003, : 289 - 302
  • [6] Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning
    Tilman, David
    Isbell, Forest
    Cowles, Jane M.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND SYSTEMATICS, VOL 45, 2014, 45 : 471 - 493
  • [7] Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Effects of the loss of salamander species richness
    Gamfeldt, Lars
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (18) : E48 - E48
  • [8] Interactive effects of climate change and biodiversity loss on ecosystem functioning
    Pires, Aliny P. F.
    Srivastava, Diane S.
    Marino, Nicholas A. C.
    MacDonald, A. Andrew M.
    Figueiredo-Barros, Marcos Paulo
    Farjalla, Vinicius F.
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2018, 99 (05) : 1203 - 1213
  • [9] Biodiversity loss and ecosystem functioning: Distinguishing between number and identity of species
    O'Connor, NE
    Crowe, TP
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2005, 86 (07) : 1783 - 1796
  • [10] Soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning
    Wall, DH
    Lynch, JM
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: CONNECTING SCIENCE AND POLICY, 2000, : 283 - 290