Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length to predict preterm birth in asymptomatic women at increased risk: a systematic review

被引:171
|
作者
Crane, J. M. G. [1 ]
Hutchens, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, St John, NF A1B 3V6, Canada
关键词
LEEP; loop electrosurgical excision procedure; meta-analysis; preterm birth; transvaginal ultrasonography; uterine anomaly;
D O I
10.1002/uog.5323
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives To estimate the ability of cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasonography in asymptomatic high-risk women to predict spontaneous preterm birth. Methods MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published in any language between January 1980 and July 2006, using the keywords 'transvaginal ultrasonography' or ('cervix' and ('ultrasound' or 'ultrasonography' or 'sonography')); and ('preterm' or 'premature') and ('delivery' or 'labour/labor' or 'birth'), identifying cohort studies evaluating transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical length measurement in predicting preterm birth in asymptomatic women who were considered at increased risk (because of a history of spontaneous preterm birth, uterine anomalies or excisional cervical procedures), with intact membranes and singleton gestations. The primary analysis included all studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Secondary analyses were also performed specifically for (1) women with a history of spontaneous preterm birth; (2) those who had undergone an excisional cervical procedure; and (3) those with uterine anomalies. Results Fourteen of 322 articles identified (involving 2258 women) met the criteria for systematic review. Cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasonography predicted spontaneous preterm birth. The shorter the cervical length cut-off the higher the positive likelihood ratio (LR). The most common cervical length cut-off was < 25 mm. Using this cut-off to predict spontaneous preterm birth at < 3 5 weeks, transvaginal ultrasonography at < 20 weeks' gestation revealed LR+ = 4.31 (95% CI, 3.08-6.01); at 20-24 weeks, LR+ = 2.78 (95% CI, 2.22-3.49); and at > 24 weeks, LR+ = 4.01 (95% CI, 2.S3-6.34). In women with a history of spontaneous preterm birth (six studies involving 663 women) cervical length at < 20 weeks revealed LR+ = 11.30 (95% CI, 3.59-35.57) and at 20-24 weeks LR+ = 2.86 (95% CI, 2.12-3.87), but there were limited data on the use of cervical length of more than 24 weeks in this group (one study involving 42 women). In women who bad bad excisional cervical procedures, two studies presented data on cervical length (one at < 24 weeks and one at > 24 weeks), finding cervical length at < 24 weeks to be predictive of spontaneous preterm birth at < 35 weeks (LR+ = 2.91, 95% CI, 1.69-5.01). One study (of 64 women) evaluated cervical length in women with uterine anomalies, finding it predictive of spontaneous preterm birth at < 35 weeks (LR+ = 8.14, 95% CI, 3.12-21.25). Conclusion Cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasonography in asymptomatic high-risk women predicts spontaneous preterm birth at < 35 weeks. Further research may be warranted to evaluate the use of transvaginal ultrasonography after 24 weeks' gestation in women with a history of spontaneous preterm birth, and in women with uterine anomalies. Copyright (C) 2008 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 587
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transvaginal sonographic cervical length for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and metaanalysis
    Conde-Agudelo, Agustin
    Romero, Roberto
    Hassan, Sonia S.
    Yeo, Lami
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 203 (02) : 128.e1 - 128.e12
  • [2] Mid-Trimester Transvaginal Ultrasonographic Cervical Length for Predicting Spontaneous Preterm Birth in Asymptomatic Women: A Review of Systematic Reviews
    Hughes, K.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 61 : 144 - 144
  • [3] The use of transvaginal ultrasound to predict preterm birth in high risk women -: A systematic review
    Crane, Joan M.
    Hutchens, Donna
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (04): : 34S - 35S
  • [4] Predictive accuracy of changes in transvaginal sonographic cervical length over time for preterm birth: a systematic review and metaanalysis
    Conde-Agudelo, Agustin
    Romero, Roberto
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 213 (06) : 789 - 801
  • [5] Biomarkers and Cervical Length to Predict Spontaneous Preterm Birth in Asymptomatic High-Risk Women
    Bastek, Jamie A.
    Hirshberg, Adi
    Chandrasekaran, Suchitra
    Owen, Carter M.
    Heiser, Laura M.
    Araujo, Brittany A.
    McShea, Meghan A.
    Ryan, Meghan E.
    Elovitz, Michal A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (02): : 283 - 289
  • [6] Combining cervical length measurement and fetal fibronectin testing to predict spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic high risk women
    Bolt, L. A.
    Chandiramani, M.
    De Greeff, A.
    Seed, P.
    Shennan, A. H.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 117 (05) : 624 - 624
  • [7] Preterm birth: the value of sonographic measurement of cervical length
    Kagan, K. O.
    To, M.
    Tsoi, E.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 : 52 - 56
  • [8] Transvaginal Ultrasonographic Measurement of Cervical Length as a Predictor of Preterm Birth A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
    Domin, Christannah M.
    Smith, Erica J.
    Terplan, Mishka
    [J]. ULTRASOUND QUARTERLY, 2010, 26 (04) : 241 - 248
  • [9] Sonographic measurement of cervical length as a predictor of preterm delivery: a systematic review
    Barros-Silva, Joana
    Pedrosa, Ana Catarina
    Matias, Alexandra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (03) : 281 - 293
  • [10] Sonographic Assessment of Cervical Length and the Risk of Preterm Birth
    Taylor, Betty Kay
    [J]. JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2011, 40 (05): : 617 - 631