Removal of Mn via coprecipitation and sorption by Fe(II), Fe(III), and Al in mine drainage

被引:3
|
作者
Kim, Duk-Min [1 ]
Im, Dae-Gyu [1 ]
Lee, Joon-Hak [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sangji Univ, Dept New Energy & Min Engn, Wonju 26339, South Korea
[2] Korea Mine Reclamat Corp, Inst Mine Reclamat Technol, Wonju 26464, South Korea
[3] Hanyang Univ, Dept Earth Resources & Environm Engn, Seoul 04763, South Korea
关键词
Required pH; Active treatment; Mn removal; X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; Fe; Mn ratio; Ferrous and ferric iron; MULTIPLET STRUCTURE; MANGANESE; WATER; OXIDATION; SPECTRA;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132367
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In mine drainage, Fe and Mn are the two most abundant elements exceeding the discharge criteria. Although Mn removal generally requires a pH exceeding 9.5-10.0, its coprecipitation and sorption by Fe and/or Al can significantly reduce the required pH. In this study, Mn removal efficiencies, mechanisms, and required pH were investigated by experiments involving varying concentrations of Mn, Fe, and Al at different pH, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analyses. At pH 7.9, precipitation as Mn (hydr)oxides was the principal Mn removal process, as indicated by the Mn removal plots, geochemical modeling, and XPS results. The precipitation was highly promoted by the heterogeneous oxidation of Fe and Al hydroxides. Coprecipitation-sorption experiments showed 65-80% lower Mn concentrations than those of sorption experiments at similar dosages and pH near 7.5. Fe(III) exhibited higher coprecipitation efficiency than Fe(II), possibly due to the prior oxidation of Fe (II). Fe(III) also displayed a coprecipitation-sorption efficiency five times more than Al. To decrease the Mn concentrations from 17-25 mg L-1 to <2 mg L-1 by coprecipitation-sorption, Fe(III)/Mn and Fe(II)/Mn ratios of -10 and -20, respectively, at pH 9.0 were required. Similarly, an Al/Mn ratio of -7 at pH 9.0 was required to reduce the Mn concentration to <5 mg L-1. Furthermore, the required Fe/Mn ratio decreased significantly when the initial Mn concentration decreased to 8-11 mg L-1. Utilizing the deduced relationships, required pH for Mn removal could be estimated and the design of Mn treatment facilities can be more efficient.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of coal mining waste for the removal of acidity and metal ions Al (III), Fe (III) and Mn (II) in acid mine drainage
    Geremias, R.
    Laus, R.
    Macan, J. M.
    Pedrosa, R. C.
    Laranjeira, M. C. M.
    Silvan, J.
    Favere, F. V.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 29 (08) : 863 - 869
  • [2] COAL MINING WASTE AS ADSORBENT FOR REMOVAL OF ACIDITY, Fe (III), Al (III) and Mn (II) IN ACID DRAINAGE
    Geremias, Reginaldo
    Laus, Rogerio
    de Favere, Valfredo Tadeu
    Pedrosa, Rozangela Curi
    [J]. QUIMICA NOVA, 2010, 33 (08): : 1677 - 1681
  • [3] Removal of trace metals by coprecipitation with Fe, Al and Mn from natural waters contaminated with acid mine drainage in the Ducktown Mining District, Tennessee
    Lee, G
    Bigham, JM
    Faure, G
    [J]. APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 17 (05) : 569 - 581
  • [4] THE COPRECIPITATION KINETICS OF CO(II) AND NI(II) WITH AL(III) AND FE(III) IN AMMONIACAL SOLUTIONS
    HAN, KH
    AHMAD, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF METALS, 1985, 37 (11): : A93 - A93
  • [5] Comparison of Fe and Mn Removal Using Treatment Agents for Acid Mine Drainage
    Choi, Jaeyoung
    Lee, Ju Young
    Yang, Jung-Seek
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF WORLD ACADEMY OF SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL 22, 2007, 22 : 186 - 188
  • [6] Comparison of Fe and Mn removal using treatment agents for acid mine drainage
    Choi, Jaeyoung
    Kwon, Dongwook
    Yang, Jung-Seek
    Lee, Ju Young
    Park, Young-Tae
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 30 (05) : 445 - 454
  • [7] Effects of Mn(II) and Fe(II) on microbial removal of arsenic (III)
    Reena Amatya Shrestha
    Bimala Lama
    Jarina Joshi
    Mika Sillanpää
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research - International, 2008, 15
  • [8] Effects of Mn(II) and Fe(II) on microbial removal of arsenic (III)
    Shrestha, Reena Amatya
    Lama, Bimala
    Joshi, Jarina
    Sillanpaa, Mika
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2008, 15 (04) : 303 - 307
  • [9] Microbially mediated Fe(II) removal from acidic coal mine drainage
    Burgos, William D.
    Senko, John M.
    Bruns, Mary Ann
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 232 : 546 - 546
  • [10] A Study Employing Differents Clays for Fe and Mn Removal in the Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage
    Goldani, Eduardo
    Moro, Celso Camilo
    Maia, Sandra Maria
    [J]. WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2013, 224 (01):