A GF-discrepancy for point selection in stochastic seismic response analysis of structures with uncertain parameters

被引:230
|
作者
Chen, Jianbing [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Junyi [2 ]
Li, Jie [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, State Key Lab Disaster Reduct Civil Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multi-dimensional integral; Generalized F-discrepancy; Non-uniform distribution; Extended Koksma-Hlawka inequality; Stochastic response; Probability density evolution method; DENSITY EVOLUTION ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS; CUBATURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.strusafe.2015.11.001
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In the stochastic dynamic analysis of nonlinear structures, the strategy of point selection plays a critical role in achieving the tradeoffs between the accuracy and efficiency. To this end, cooperated with the concept of the extended F-discrepancy (EF-discrepancy), the Koksma-Hlawka inequality, which bounds the worst error of cubature formulae, is extended to the cases involving non-uniform distributions in the present paper. Further, in order to avoid the computational complexity of EF-discrepancy, the Generalized F-discrepancy (GF-discrepancy) is introduced. In light of the quantitative equivalence between the EF-discrepancy and GF-discrepancy, the extended Koksma-Hlawka inequality could be modified by replacing the EF-discrepancy with the GF-discrepancy. Thereby the rationality of adopting GF-discrepancy as the objective function of point selection is theoretically supported. Thus, by reducing the GF-discrepancy, a new strategy of representative point set determination via rearrangement is proposed. The proposed approach is then applied to stochastic dynamical response analysis of strong nonlinear structures by incorporated into the probability density evolution method, showing its effectiveness for practical applications. Problems to be further studied are outlined. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 31
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Seismic response analysis of nonlinear structures with Uncertain parameters under stochastic ground motions
    Xu, Jun
    Feng, De-Cheng
    [J]. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2018, 111 : 149 - 159
  • [2] Random seismic response analysis of truss structures with uncertain parameters
    Gao, Wei
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2007, 29 (07) : 1487 - 1498
  • [3] A marginal fractional moments based strategy for points selection in seismic response analysis of nonlinear structures with uncertain parameters
    Xu, Jun
    Wang, Ding
    Dang, Chao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2017, 387 : 226 - 238
  • [4] Spectral stochastic analysis of structures with uncertain parameters
    Sniady, P.
    Adamowski, R.
    Kogut, G.
    Zielichowski-Haber, W.
    [J]. PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2008, 23 (01) : 76 - 83
  • [5] STOCHASTIC RESPONSE OF STRUCTURES WITH UNCERTAIN-BUT-BOUNDED PARAMETERS
    Muscolino, Giuseppe
    Sofi, Alba
    [J]. IMECE 2009: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, VOL 10, PTS A AND B, 2010, : 685 - 694
  • [6] A partial decomposition cutting method with CF-discrepancy for points selection in stochastic seismic analysis of structures
    Zhang, Yang
    Xu, Jun
    [J]. STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2024, 111
  • [8] Seismic response analysis of damper-connected adjacent structures with stochastic parameters
    Ge, Dong-dong
    Zhu, Hong-ping
    Wang, Dan-sheng
    Huang, Min-shui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE A, 2010, 11 (06): : 402 - 414
  • [9] Seismic response analysis of damper-connected adjacent structures with stochastic parameters
    Dong-dong Ge
    Hong-ping Zhu
    Dan-sheng Wang
    Min-shui Huang
    [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 2010, 11 : 402 - 414
  • [10] Study on stochastic seismic response for nonlinear soil structure with uncertain parameters
    Zhou, A. H.
    Zhang, H. R.
    Yuan, Y.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ENVIRONMENT VIBRATIONS: PREDICTION, MONITORING, MITIGATION AND EVALUATION, ISEV 2007, 2007, : 167 - 172