Online course evaluations: faculty perspective and strategies for improved response rates

被引:47
|
作者
Crews, Tena B. [1 ,2 ]
Curtis, Dylan F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Carolina, Ctr Teaching Excellence, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[2] Coll Hospitality Retail & Sport Management, Integrated Informat Technol Program, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[3] Acad Finance, Lansdowne High Sch, Baltimore, MD 21227 USA
关键词
course evaluations; online course evaluations; traditional course evaluations; STUDENT;
D O I
10.1080/02602938.2010.493970
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article provides an overview of issues involved with traditional paper versus online course evaluations. Data were gathered from university faculty, who transitioned from traditional paper to online course evaluations. Faculty preferred traditional course evaluations versus online course evaluations by a small margin. However, faculty overwhelmingly believed that traditional course evaluations result in higher response rates from students. Incentives were also believed by faculty to increase student response rates. Suggestions from faculty on how to improve student response rates are also provided in this article.
引用
收藏
页码:865 / 878
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ONLINE COURSE EVALUATION - STRATEGIES FOR INCREASING STUDENT RESPONSE RATES
    Opre, Dana
    Buzgar, Ramona
    [J]. 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2017), 2017, : 3624 - 3628
  • [2] A Reflection of Faculty and Course Evaluations
    Fjortoft, Nancy
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 79 (09)
  • [3] Student evaluations of teaching: the impact of faculty procedures on response rates
    Young, Karen
    Joines, Jeffrey
    Standish, Trey
    Gallagher, Victoria
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (01) : 37 - 49
  • [4] Are online student evaluations of faculty influenced by the timing of evaluations?
    McNulty, John A.
    Gruener, Gregory
    Chandrasekhar, Arcot
    Espiritu, Baltazar
    Hoyt, Amy
    Ensminger, David
    [J]. ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2010, 34 (04) : 213 - 216
  • [5] Faculty perspectives on course and teacher evaluations
    Schmelkin, LP
    Spencer, KJ
    Gellman, ES
    [J]. RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1997, 38 (05) : 575 - 592
  • [6] Faculty Perspectives on Course and Teacher Evaluations
    Liora Pedhazur Schmelkin
    Karin J. Spencer
    Estelle S. Gellman
    [J]. Research in Higher Education, 1997, 38 : 575 - 592
  • [7] Faculty course evaluations and class size
    Fisher, Christine
    Vu, Phu
    Lai, Philip
    [J]. ACTIVE LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2024, 25 (02) : 272 - 284
  • [8] The impact of tenure on faculty course evaluations
    Gourley, Patrick
    Madonia, Greg
    [J]. EDUCATION ECONOMICS, 2021, 29 (01) : 73 - 104
  • [9] Extra Credit Micro-Incentives and Response Rates for Online Course Evaluations: Two Quasi-Experiments
    Sundstrom, Eric D.
    Hardin, Erin E.
    Shaffer, Matthew J.
    [J]. TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 43 (04) : 276 - 284
  • [10] Strategies to improve response rates to online surveys
    Diaz de Rada, Vidal
    [J]. PAPERS-REVISTA DE SOCIOLOGIA, 2022, 107 (04):