Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search

被引:26
|
作者
Wolfe, Jeremy M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cain, Matthew S. [4 ,5 ]
Aizenman, Avigael M. [6 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Surg, Visual Attent Lab, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Ophthalmol & Radiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Surg, Visual Attent Lab, 64 Sidney St,Suite 170, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[4] US Army, Ctr Dev & Engn, Natick Soldier Res, Natick, MA 01760 USA
[5] Tufts Univ, Ctr Appl Brain & Cognit Sci, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[6] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Vis Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
Visual search; Priming; Working memory; WORKING-MEMORY; TOP-DOWN; INFORMATION; ATTENTION; MODEL; MIND; EXPLOITATION; POLYMORPHISM; CRYPTICITY; CATEGORIES;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-018-01649-5
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In Hybrid Foraging tasks, observers search for multiple instances of several types of target. Collecting all the dirty laundry and kitchenware out of a child's room would be a real-world example. How are such foraging episodes structured? A series of four experiments shows that selection of one item from the display makes it more likely that the next item will be of the same type. This pattern holds if the targets are defined by basic features like color and shape but not if they are defined by their identity (e.g., the letters p & d). Additionally, switching between target types during search is expensive in time, with longer response times between successive selections if the target type changes than if they are the same. Finally, the decision to leave a screen/patch for the next screen in these foraging tasks is imperfectly consistent with the predictions of optimal foraging theory. The results of these hybrid foraging studies cast new light on the ways in which prior selection history guides subsequent visual search in general.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 653
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Guidance and selection history in hybrid foraging visual search
    Jeremy M. Wolfe
    Matthew S. Cain
    Avigael M. Aizenman
    [J]. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2019, 81 : 637 - 653
  • [2] Eye guidance and visual search
    Findlay, J
    Brown, V
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 35 (3-4) : 316 - 316
  • [3] Is visual search really like foraging?
    Gilchrist, ID
    North, A
    Hood, B
    [J]. PERCEPTION, 2001, 30 (12) : 1459 - 1464
  • [4] Coarse guidance by numerosity in visual search
    Reijnen, E.
    Krummenacher, J.
    Kuzmova, Y.
    Wolfe, J. M.
    [J]. PERCEPTION, 2010, 39 : 191 - 192
  • [5] Coarse guidance by numerosity in visual search
    Ester Reijnen
    Jeremy M. Wolfe
    Joseph Krummenacher
    [J]. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2013, 75 : 16 - 28
  • [6] Guidance of Visual Search by Memory and Knowledge
    Hollingworth, Andrew
    [J]. INFLUENCE OF ATTENTION, LEARNING, AND MOTIVATION ON VISUAL SEARCH, 2012, 59 : 63 - 89
  • [7] Coarse guidance by numerosity in visual search
    Reijnen, Ester
    Wolfe, Jeremy M.
    Krummenacher, Joseph
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2013, 75 (01) : 16 - 28
  • [8] Priming and the guidance by visual and categorical templates in visual search
    Wilschut, Anna
    Theeuwes, Jan
    Olivers, Christian N. L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [9] Modeling the Effect of Selection History on Pop-Out Visual Search
    Tseng, Yuan-Chi
    Glaser, Joshua I.
    Caddigan, Eamon
    Lleras, Alejandro
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [10] Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search
    Klein, RM
    MacInnes, WJ
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (04) : 346 - 352