Detection of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis wrist joints with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and radiography

被引:114
|
作者
Dohn, Uffe Moller [1 ]
Ejbjerg, Bo J. [1 ]
Hasselquist, Maria [2 ]
Narvestad, Eva [3 ]
Moller, Jakob [2 ]
Thomsen, Henrik S. [2 ]
Ostergaard, Mikkel [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Herlev Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, DK-2630 Herlev, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Radiol, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Herlev Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, DK-2630 Herlev, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1186/ar2378
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The objectives of the present study were, with multidetector computed tomography (CT) as the reference method, to determine the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiography for the detection of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis wrist bones, and to test whether measuring volumes of erosions on CT and MRI is reproducible and correlated to semiquantitative assessments (scores) of erosions on CT, MRI and radiography. Methods Seventeen patients with rheumatoid arthritis and four healthy control individuals underwent CT, MRI and radiography of one wrist, performed on the same day. CT was performed on a Philips Mx8000IDT unit (voxel size 0.4 mm x 0.4 mm x 1 mm) and MRI was performed on a Philips Panorama 0.6T unit (voxel size 0.4 mm x 0.4 mm x 0.4 mm). Images were evaluated separately for erosions in all wrist bones and were scored according to the principles of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (CT and MRI) and the Sharp/van der Heijde (radiographs) scoring methods. Measurements of erosion volumes of all erosions were performed twice with a 1-week interval. Results With CT as the reference method, the overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (concordance) of MRI for detecting erosions were 61%, 93% and 77%, respectively, while the respective values were 24%, 99% and 63% for radiography. The intramodality agreements when measuring erosion volumes were high for both CT and MRI (Spearman correlation coefficients 0.92 and 0.90 (both P < 0.01), respectively). Correlations between volumes and scores of individual erosions were 0.96 for CT and 0.99 for MRI, while they were 0.83 (CT) and 0.80 (MRI) for persons' total erosion volume and total score (all P < 0.01). Conclusion With CT as the reference method, MRI showed moderate sensitivity and good specificity and accuracy for detection of erosions in rheumatoid arthritis and healthy wrist bones, while radiography showed very low sensitivity. The tested volumetric method was highly reproducible and correlated to scores of erosions.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Detection of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis wrist joints with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and radiography
    Uffe Møller Døhn
    Bo J Ejbjerg
    Maria Hasselquist
    Eva Narvestad
    Jakob Møller
    Henrik S Thomsen
    Mikkel Østergaard
    [J]. Arthritis Research & Therapy, 10
  • [2] Detection of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis wrist joints with magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography
    Dohn, U. Moller
    Ejbjerg, B. J.
    Narvestad, E.
    Hasselquist, M.
    Szkudlarek, M.
    Moller, J. M.
    Thomsen, H. S.
    Ostergaard, M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2007, 66 : 568 - 569
  • [3] Detection of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis wrist and meta-carpophalangeal joints: A comparison of ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Vargas, Juan Ignacio
    Ortega, Claudia
    Burdiles, Alvaro
    Contreras, Oscar
    Massardo, Loreto
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2006, 54 (09): : S134 - S134
  • [4] Are bone erosions detected by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography true erosions? A comparison with computed tomography in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints
    Uffe Møller Døhn
    Bo J Ejbjerg
    Michel Court-Payen
    Maria Hasselquist
    Eva Narvestad
    Marcin Szkudlarek
    Jakob M Møller
    Henrik S Thomsen
    Mikkel Østergaard
    [J]. Arthritis Research & Therapy, 8
  • [5] Are bone erosions detected by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography true erosions? A comparison with computed tomography in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints
    Dohn, Uffe Moller
    Ejbjerg, Bo J.
    Court-Payen, Michel
    Hasselquist, Maria
    Narvestad, Eva
    Szkudlarek, Marcin
    Moller, Jakob M.
    Thomsen, Henrik S.
    Ostergaard, Mikkel
    [J]. ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2006, 8 (04)
  • [6] Evaluation of humeral head erosions in rheumatoid arthritis:: A comparison of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and plain radiography
    Alasaarela, E
    Suramo, I
    Tervonen, O
    Lähde, S
    Takalo, R
    Hakala, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1998, 37 (11): : 1152 - 1156
  • [7] Evaluation of Bone Erosions in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Ultrasound
    Albayda, Jemima
    Thawait, Gaurav
    Zbijewski, Wojciech
    Martin, Alexander
    Demehri, Shadpour
    Fritz, Jan
    Yorkston, John
    Siewerdsen, Jeff
    Bingham, Clifton O., III
    [J]. ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 69
  • [8] Topography of Bone Erosions at the Metatarsophalangeal Joints in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Bilateral Mapping by Computed Tomography
    Simoni, Paolo
    Moussaddykine, Sakina
    Malaise, Olivier
    Ben Mustapha, Selma
    Aparisi Gomez, Maria Pilar
    De Leucio, Alessandro
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (06)
  • [9] Imaging in early rheumatoid arthritis: roles of magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, conventional radiography and computed tomography
    Ostergaard, M
    Ejbjerg, B
    Szkudlarek, M
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2005, 19 (01): : 91 - 116
  • [10] Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography
    Mikkel Østergaard
    Mikael Boesen
    [J]. La radiologia medica, 2019, 124 : 1128 - 1141