Choice of cross size in stereology - a cautionary note

被引:5
|
作者
Dickson, JM
Weavers, HM
Mitchell, N
Winter, EM
Wilkinson, ID
VanBeek, EJR
Griffiths, PD
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Biomed Sci, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Ctr Sport & Exercise Sci, Sheffield S1 1WB, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Sheffield, Unit Acad Radiol, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
brain volume; stereology; point counting; volume estimation; magnetic resonance imaging;
D O I
10.1007/s00234-003-1091-0
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The stereological method of cross-counting based on the Cavalieri principle is widely used in neuroimaging to estimate the volume of cerebral structures. Although superficially simple, the stereological technique is validated by arcane mathematical proofs, so the cross size is determined by most investigators on a pragmatic basis with the assumption that the volume calculated is independent of the cross size used. We used three cross sizes (8x8, 5x5 and 3x3 voxels) to estimate the brain volume of six healthy control subjects. The volume estimate using a cross size of 3x3 was 9% larger than with a cross size of 5x5 and the latter was 15% larger than with a cross size of 8x8. We conclude that cross size significantly affects whole brain volume estimates and this result is presumably applicable to other structures whose cross-sectional areas form complex shapes. Investigators should be aware of this fact, especially when trying to make direct comparisons between volume estimates derived from the stereological method using different cross sizes.
引用
收藏
页码:896 / 899
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Choice of cross size in stereology—a cautionary note
    J. M. Dickson
    H. M. Weavers
    N. Mitchell
    E. M. Winter
    I. D. Wilkinson
    E. J. R. VanBeek
    P. D. Griffiths
    [J]. Neuroradiology, 2003, 45 : 896 - 899
  • [2] Choice of cross size in stereology
    J. M. Dickson
    [J]. Neuroradiology, 2004, 46 : 333 - 333
  • [3] Choice of cross size in stereology
    Reilly, JF
    [J]. NEURORADIOLOGY, 2004, 46 (04) : 332 - 332
  • [4] Choice of cross size in stereology
    J. F. Reilly
    [J]. Neuroradiology, 2004, 46 (4) : 332 - 332
  • [5] A Cautionary Note on Estimating Effect Size
    van den Bergh, Don
    Haaf, Julia M.
    Ly, Alexander
    Rouder, Jeffrey N.
    Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan
    [J]. ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 4 (01)
  • [6] Noisy Preferences in Risky Choice: A Cautionary Note
    Bhatia, Sudeep
    Loomes, Graham
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2017, 124 (05) : 678 - 688
  • [7] ORNSTEINS STORAGE SIZE METAPHOR - CAUTIONARY NOTE
    JANKOWICZ, AZ
    [J]. PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1977, 45 (01) : 284 - 286
  • [8] A Cautionary Note on the Design of Discrete Choice Experiments: Reply
    Lusk, Jayson L.
    Norwood, F. Bailey
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 91 (04) : 1064 - 1066
  • [9] On the Choice of Baselines in Multiattribute Portfolio Analysis: A Cautionary Note
    Clemen, Robert T.
    Smith, James E.
    [J]. DECISION ANALYSIS, 2009, 6 (04) : 256 - 262
  • [10] Cross-group comparisons: A cautionary note
    Yoo, B
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2002, 19 (04) : 357 - 368