M. M. BOGOSLOVSKY'S DRAMATIC REFLECTION

被引:0
|
作者
Kabytov, Pyotr [1 ]
Barinova, Yekaterina [2 ]
机构
[1] Samara Natl Res Univ, Samara, Russia
[2] Samara State Econ Univ, Samara, Russia
来源
QUAESTIO ROSSICA | 2018年 / 6卷 / 04期
关键词
diary notes; M; Bogoslovsky; Russian Empire; Moscow University; state authorities; political parties; 1917 Russian Revolution;
D O I
10.15826/qr.2018.4.356
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This article analyses the Diaries of the outstanding Russian historian Mikhail Bogoslovsky, a professor at Moscow Imperial University. The authors reveal the peculiarities of this unique historical source, largely filling in the gaps and lacunae of the archival materials and documentary publications that contain the official assessment of certain events. Bogoslovsky offers a wide panorama of events and facts, and not only his personal story: one may find an assessment of many of the events of his era, as well as of public authorities, representatives of the imperial administration, deputies of the 4th State Duma, and leaders of political parties. The article analyses Bogoslovsky's pedagogical activity and substantiates the thesis that among his diverse occupations, scholarly work was of primary importance for the historian. The authors focus on the peculiarities of the historian's relations with his colleagues and students. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the work on his main study, a multivolume book on the life of Emperor Peter I. The article provides information on the daily life of the historian's family, which allows the authors to identify how the scholar mastered the new social practices which helped him, like many other city-dwellers, survive in the face of a growing crisis in all spheres of economic and sociocultural life during the period of revolutionary chaos. Between 1916 and 1917, owing to an increase in crisis phenomena, the everyday life of the population of Russia took another turn. In this context, influenced by periodicals, the diaries give an impartial assessment of the ineffective work of the imperial administration, the deputies of the 4th State Duma, and the local authorities. Comparing the past of Russia with its current reality, he makes attempts to predict the future of Russian statehood. The authors conclude that in trying to escape from the dramatic reality of his time, the historian increasingly began to turn to the historical situation of the 18th century.
引用
收藏
页码:1217 / 1230
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] From the diary of Academician M. M. Bogoslovsky
    Neberekutina, E. V.
    Safronova, T. V.
    VOPROSY ISTORII, 2009, (02) : 91 - 111
  • [2] 'ZUSTER M. M.'
    SCHIPPER, A
    MAATSTAF, 1996, 44 : 52 - 52
  • [4] BLOK'S CONTEXT OF THE FIREWOOD BY M. M. ZOSHCHENKO
    Kolesnikova, Elena Ivanovna
    Yan, Meiping
    RUSSKAIA LITERATURA, 2021, (03): : 108 - +
  • [5] Cultural Paradigms in M. M. Zoshchenko's Poetics
    Sok, Kim Dzhun
    RUSSKAIA LITERATURA, 2016, (01): : 176 - 181
  • [6] A gender-stereotyped representation of Marie in Jean-Philippe Toussaint’s tetralogy M. M. M. M. (2017)
    Greta Brodahl
    Neophilologus, 2020, 104 : 469 - 483
  • [7] GORKY,M. AND VOLOSHIN,M.
    KUPCHENKO, VP
    RUSSKAIA LITERATURA, 1976, (02): : 144 - 151
  • [8] 'M. T. M.'
    KRALICEK, W
    THEATER HEUTE, 1994, (07): : 49 - 49
  • [9] Metaphorical Interpretation of Genesis in M. M. Prishvin's Works
    Chumakov, Aleksey
    Shnurenko, Tatiana
    Zhilyakov, Sergey
    Mochalin, Anatoly
    TARIH KULTUR VE SANAT ARASTIRMALARI DERGISI-JOURNAL OF HISTORY CULTURE AND ART RESEARCH, 2018, 7 (04): : 442 - 447
  • [10] ON A WRITERS' FRIENDSHIP: M. M. PRISHVIN AND S. Т. GRIGORYEV
    Nikitin, E. N.
    RUSSKAIA LITERATURA, 2024, (01): : 220 - 227