Statistical Considerations for Analyses of Time-To-Event Endpoints in Oncology Clinical Trials: Illustrations with CAR-T Immunotherapy Studies

被引:6
|
作者
Li, Yimei [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,8 ]
Hwang, Wei-Ting [1 ]
Maude, Shannon L. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Teachey, David T. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Frey, Noelle V. [5 ]
Myers, Regina M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Leahy, Allison Barz [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Liu, Hongyan [6 ]
Porter, David L. [5 ]
Grupp, Stephan A. [2 ,3 ]
Shaw, Pamela A. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Div Oncol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Ctr Childhood Canc Res, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Univ Penn, Abramson Canc Ctr, Perelman Sch Med, Div Hematol Oncol,Cell Therapy & Transplant, Philadelphia, PA USA
[6] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Biomed & Hlth Informat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[7] Kaiser Permanente Washington Hlth Res Inst, Biostat Unit, Seattle, WA USA
[8] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, 423 Guardian Dr,626 Blockley Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; IMMORTAL PERSON-TIME; COMPETING RISKS; SAMPLE-SIZE; REGRESSION-MODEL; CUMULATIVE INCIDENCE; COX REGRESSION; SURVIVAL; CELLS; SUBDISTRIBUTION;
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-0560
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is an exciting development in the field of cancer immunology and has received a lot of interest in recent years. Many time-to-event (TTE) endpoints related to relapse, disease progression, and remission are analyzed in CAR-T studies to assess treatment efficacy. Definitions of these TTE endpoints are not always consistent, even for the same outcomes (e.g., progression-free survival), which often stems from analysis choices regarding which events to consider as part of the composite endpoint, censoring or competing risk in the analysis. Subsequent therapies such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are common but are not treated the same in different studies. Standard survival analysis methods are commonly applied to TTE analyses but often without full consideration of the assumptions inherent in the chosen analysis. We highlight two important issues of TTE analysis that arise in CAR-T studies, as well as in other settings in oncology: the handling of competing risks and assessing the asso-ciation between a time-varying (post-infusion) exposure and the TTE outcome. We review existing analytical methods, including the cumulative incidence function and regression models for analysis of competing risks, and landmark and time-varying covariate analysis for analysis of post-infusion exposures. We clarify the scientific questions that the different analytical approaches address and illustrate how the application of an inappropriate method could lead to different results using data from multiple published CAR-T studies. Codes for implementing these methods in standard statis-tical software are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:3940 / 3949
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multistate platform model for time-to-event endpoints in oncology clinical trials
    Lin, Chih-Wei
    Nagase, Mario
    Doshi, Sameer
    Dutta, Sandeep
    [J]. CPT-PHARMACOMETRICS & SYSTEMS PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 13 (01): : 154 - 167
  • [2] CONCORDANCE OF REAL-WORLD TIME-TO-EVENT ENDPOINTS WITH CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN ONCOLOGY STUDIES
    Aguilar, K.
    Boyd, M.
    Davies, K.
    Espirito, J.
    Robert, N.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S26 - S26
  • [3] Heterogeneous treatment effects in stratified clinical trials with time-to-event endpoints
    Beisel, Christina
    Benner, Axel
    Kunz, Christina
    Kopp-Schneider, Annette
    [J]. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 59 (03) : 511 - 530
  • [4] Sample sizes for clinical trials with time-to-event endpoints and competing risks
    Schulgen, G
    Olschewski, M
    Krane, V
    Wanner, C
    Ruf, G
    Schumacher, M
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2005, 26 (03) : 386 - 396
  • [5] Meta-analysis of clinical trials with competing time-to-event endpoints
    Meddis, Alessandra
    Latouche, Aurelien
    Zhou, Bingqing
    Michiels, Stefan
    Fine, Jason
    [J]. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 62 (03) : 712 - 723
  • [6] Methods for Using Aggregate Historical Control Data in Meta-Analyses of Clinical Trials With Time-to-Event Endpoints
    Holzhauer, Bjorn
    [J]. STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 12 (01): : 107 - 116
  • [7] LEVERAGING REAL-WORLD DATA FOR TIME-TO-EVENT ENDPOINTS IN CLINICAL TRIALS
    Parashar, D.
    Almgren, P.
    Berglund, A.
    Guasconi, A.
    Smith, C.
    Torlinska, B.
    Wang, J.
    Wang, Q.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (01) : S256 - S256
  • [8] An evaluation of statistical methods for predicting timelines for reaching target number of events in clinical trials with time-to-event endpoints
    Clark, Emma
    Helms, Hans-Joachim
    Stanzel, Sven
    Xia, Fan
    [J]. TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [9] Bayesian design of multi-regional clinical trials with time-to-event endpoints
    Bean, Nathan William
    Ibrahim, Joseph George
    Psioda, Matthew Austin
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2023, 79 (04) : 3586 - 3598
  • [10] Assessing Clinical Equivalence in Oncology Biosimilar Trials With Time-to-Event Outcomes
    Uno, Hajime
    Schrag, Deborah
    Kim, Dae Hyun
    Tang, Dejun
    Tian, Lu
    Rugo, Hope S.
    Wei, Lee-Jen
    [J]. JNCI CANCER SPECTRUM, 2019, 3 (04)