共 50 条
Clinical Pharmacists as Educators in Family Medicine Residency Programs: A CERA Study of Program Directors
被引:0
|作者:
Jarrett, Jennie B.
[1
]
Lounsbery, Jody L.
[2
,3
]
D'Amico, Frank
[1
]
Dickerson, Lori M.
[5
]
Franko, John
[6
]
Nagle, John
[7
]
Seehusen, Dean A.
[8
]
Wilson, Stephen A.
[1
,4
]
机构:
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, St Margaret Family Med Residency Program, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Care & Hlth Syst, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Family Med & Community Hlth, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Family Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[5] Med Univ S Carolina, Dept Family Med, Charleston, SC USA
[6] E Tennessee State Univ, Dept Family Med, Johnson City, TN 37614 USA
[7] Univ Colorado Family Med Residency, Denver, CO USA
[8] Dwight D Eisenhower Army Med Ctr, Ft Gordon, GA USA
关键词:
ECONOMIC OUTCOMES;
SERVICES;
MANAGEMENT;
RECOMMENDATIONS;
PRACTITIONERS;
FUTURE;
D O I:
暂无
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The clinical pharmacist's role within family medicine residency programs (FMRPs) is well established. However, there is limited information regarding perceptions of program directors (PDs) about clinical pharmacy educators. The study objectives were (1) to estimate the prevalence of clinical pharmacists within FMRPs and (2) to determine barriers and motivations for incorporation of clinical pharmacists as educators. METHODS: The Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) distributed an electronic survey to PDs. Questions addressed formalized pharmacotherapy education, clinical pharmacists in educator roles, and barriers and benefits of clinical pharmacists in FMRPs. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 50% (224/451). Seventy-six percent (170/224) of the responding PDs reported that clinical pharmacists provide pharmacotherapy education in their FMRPs, and 57% (97/170) consider clinical pharmacists as faculty members. In programs with clinical pharmacists, 72% (83/116) of PDs reported having a systematic approach for teaching pharmacotherapy versus 22% (21/95) in programs without. In programs without clinical pharmacists, the top barrier to incorporation was limited ability to bill for clinical services 48% (43/89) versus 29% (32/112) in programs with clinical pharmacists. In both programs with and without clinical pharmacists, the top benefit of having clinical pharmacists was providing a collaborative approach to pharmacotherapy education for residents (35% and 36%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of FMRPs incorporate clinical pharmacists as faculty members. Despite providing collaborative approaches to pharmacotherapy education, their limited ability to bill for services is a major barrier.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 186
页数:7
相关论文