Anatomical suitability of abdominal aortic aneurysms for endovascular repair

被引:72
|
作者
Armon, MP [1 ]
Yusuf, SW [1 ]
Latief, K [1 ]
Whitaker, SC [1 ]
Gregson, RHS [1 ]
Wenham, PW [1 ]
Hopkinson, BR [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV NOTTINGHAM HOSP,DEPT RADIOL,NOTTINGHAM NG7 2UH,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1002/bjs.1800840210
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Aortic aneurysm anatomy is crucial when considering patients for endovascular repair. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of patients with aortic aneurysm suitable for endovascular repair with three different graft-stent systems. Methods Spiral computed tomographic angiography was used to assess the anatomy of 154 abdominal aortic aneurysms. Measurements were made of aneurysm neck length and diameter, renal artery to aortic bifurcation length, common iliac artery diameter and length, and external iliac artery diameter. Aneurysms were assessed for anatomical suitability for currently available aortoaortic, aortobi-iliac and aortouni-iliac devices. Results Six patients (4 per cent) had a distal aortic neck suitable for implantation of a straight aortic graft. Fifteen patients (10 per cent) had arterial anatomy suitable for implantation of a bifurcated graft and 85 (55 per cent) patients were suitable for endovascular repair with an aortouni-iliac graft. The primary reasons for unsuitability were: proximal neck length less than 1.5 cm (44 patients), proximal neck diameter greater than 3.0 cm (12), and angulation of the proximal neck (three). A further ten patients were considered unsuitable for an aortouni-iliac graft because of bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms (four), tortuous iliac arteries (four) and narrow external iliac arteries (two). Conclusion The aortouni-iliac device has the widest applicability of the currently available endo vascular systems but open repair remains the only option for a large proportion of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 180
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anatomical suitability of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms for endovascular repair
    Rose, DFG
    Davidson, IR
    Hinchliffe, RJ
    Whitaker, SC
    Gregson, TH
    MacSweeney, ST
    Hopkinson, BR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2003, 10 (03) : 453 - 457
  • [2] The rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms - Is this modified by anatomical suitability for endovascular repair?
    Powell, Janet T.
    Brown, Louise C.
    Greenhalgh, Roger M.
    Thompson, Simon G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 247 (01) : 173 - 179
  • [3] Anatomic Suitability of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms for Endovascular Repair
    Slater, Bethany J.
    Harris, E. John
    Lee, Jason T.
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 22 (06) : 716 - 722
  • [4] Suitability of abdominal aortic aneurysms for endovascular repair: It's not the size ...
    Allen, RC
    Fogarty, TJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 4 (03): : 284 - 285
  • [5] Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Arnaoutakis, Dean J.
    Zammert, Martin
    Karthikesalingam, Alan
    Belkin, Michael
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH-CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 30 (03) : 331 - 340
  • [6] Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Fan, CM
    Santilli, JG
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 37 (04) : 282 - 292
  • [7] Endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Debono, Samuel
    Nash, Jennifer
    Tambyraja, Andrew L.
    Newby, David E.
    Forsythe, Rachael O.
    [J]. HEART, 2021, 107 (22) : 1783 - 1789
  • [8] Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Bell, PRF
    [J]. VASCULAR MEDICINE, 2002, 7 (04) : 253 - 255
  • [9] Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Endovascular Repair
    Jim, Jeffrey
    Sanchez, Luis A.
    [J]. MOUNT SINAI JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 77 (03): : 238 - 249
  • [10] The Importance of Anatomical Suitability and Fitness for the Outcome of Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Richards, T.
    Goode, S. D.
    Hinchliffe, R.
    Altaf, N.
    MacSweeney, S.
    Braithwaite, B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 38 (03) : 285 - 290