Non-cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells as a safe and effective alternative for autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma

被引:3
|
作者
Araujo, Anelise Bergmann [1 ]
Soares, Tahiane Brum [2 ]
Schmalfuss, Tissiana [1 ]
Angeli, Melissa Helena [1 ]
Furlan, Juliana Monteiro [1 ]
Salton, Gabrielle Dias [1 ]
Burin, Mariana Monteiro [2 ]
Rohsig, Liane Marise [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Porto Alegre, Serv Hemoterapia, Ctr Proc Celular, Ramiro Barcelos 2350, BR-90035903 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Hosp Clin Porto Alegre, Serv Hematol, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
autologous transplantation; fresh PBSC; hematopoietic progenitor cells; marrow transplantation; multiple myeloma; peripheral blood stem cells; BONE-MARROW; EXPERIENCE; INFUSION;
D O I
10.1111/trf.17090
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Autologous stem cell transplantation is the standard procedure for multiple myeloma and the grafts are usually cryopreserved. Previous studies reported advantages in the use of fresh peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) autotransplantation compared to cryopreservation of the grafts. This study compared the transplant-related outcomes of two graft preservation methods: fresh storage (4 degrees C/72 h) and cryopreservation (-80 degrees C). Study Design and Methods We performed an analysis of 45 patients with multiple myeloma under autotransplantation (17 fresh and 28 cryopreserved) from 2017 to 2021. Fresh PBSC were maintained in the refrigerator for three days in a concentration up to 300 x 10(3) TNC/mu L. Cryopreserved PBSC were concentrated by plasma reduction after centrifugation (950 g/10 min/4 degrees C) and an equal volume of cryoprotection solution was added for a final concentration of 300 x 10(3) TNC/mu L, 5% DMSO, 6% hydroxyethyl starch, and 3% human albumin. Results Neutrophil engraftment was significantly faster with fresh PBSCs (10 vs. 11.5 days, p = 0.045). Adverse effects were more common in cryopreserved PBSC transplantation (75% vs. 35.3% patients; p = 0.013). Post transplantation hospital stay was 20 and 22 days for fresh and cryopreserved PBSCs respectively (p = 0.091). There was no difference in platelet engraftment time (10.5 days for both; p = 0.133), number of antibiotics used after transplantation (3 for fresh and 2.5 for cryopreserved; p = 0.828), days of antibiotic use after transplantation (12.2 days for fresh and 13.3 days for cryopreserved, p = 0.579), and overall survival (p = 0.736). Conclusion The infusion of fresh PBSC refrigerated for up to three days is effective and safe for autologous transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma, which is a useful alternative to cryopreserved PBSC.
引用
收藏
页码:1967 / 1972
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Non-cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma: Bicentric study
    Jennane, S.
    Hasnaoui, N.
    Mahtat, E. M.
    Merimi, F.
    Bougar, S.
    El Maaroufi, H.
    Belmekki, A.
    Zafad, S.
    Essakalli, M.
    Mikdame, M.
    Doghmi, K.
    [J]. TRANSFUSION CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 2020, 27 (03) : 152 - 156
  • [2] Outcomes of Non-Cryopreserved Versus Cryopreserved Peripheral Blood Stem Cells for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma
    Piriyakhuntorn, Pokpong
    Tantiworawit, Adisak
    Rattanathammethee, Thanawat
    Hantrakool, Sasinee
    Chai-Adisaksopha, Chatree
    Rattarittamrong, Ekarat
    Norasetthada, Lalita
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 25 : e927084 - 1
  • [3] Outcomes of Non-cryopreserved Versus Cryopreserved Peripheral Blood Stem Cells for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma
    Piriyakhuntorn, Pokpong
    Tantiworawit, Adisak
    Rattanathammethee, Thanawat
    Hantrakool, Sasinee
    Chai-Adisaksopha, Chatree
    Rattarittamrong, Ekarat
    Norasetthada, Lalita
    [J]. BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 55 (SUPPL 1) : 562 - 564
  • [4] NON-CRYOPRESERVED AUTOLOGOUS PERIPHERAL BLOOD HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION (HSCT) FOR MULTIPLE MYELOMA
    Ramzi, M.
    Zakerinia, M.
    Nourani, H.
    Dehghani, M.
    Vojdani, R.
    Karimi, M.
    Nejad, H. Haghighi
    [J]. BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 49 : S451 - S451
  • [5] Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using non-cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells graft is effective in multiple myeloma and lymphoma
    Naithani, Rahul
    Dayal, Nitin
    Pathak, Sangeeta
    Rai, Reeta
    [J]. BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 53 (09) : 1198 - 1200
  • [6] Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using non-cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells graft is effective in multiple myeloma and lymphoma
    Rahul Naithani
    Nitin Dayal
    Sangeeta Pathak
    Reeta Rai
    [J]. Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2018, 53 : 1198 - 1200
  • [7] Non-cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cell graft for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma and lymphoma
    Noiperm, P.
    Julamanee, J.
    Viboonjuntra, P.
    Lekhakula, A.
    [J]. BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 57 (SUPPL 1) : 236 - 237
  • [8] Non-Cryopreserved Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Graft for Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma and Lymphoma Patients
    Noiperm, Panarat
    Julamanee, Jakrawadee
    Viboonjuntra, Pongtep
    Lekhakula, Arnuparp
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 28
  • [9] Cryopreserved versus non-cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells for autologous transplantation after high-dose Melphalan in multiple myeloma: comparative analysis
    M. C. B. Bittencourt
    L. Mariano
    F. Moreira
    J. Schmidt-Filho
    A. Mendrone-Jr
    V. Rocha
    [J]. Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2019, 54 : 138 - 141
  • [10] Cryopreserved versus non-cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells for autologous transplantation after high-dose Melphalan in multiple myeloma: comparative analysis
    Bittencourt, M. C. B.
    Mariano, L.
    Moreira, F.
    Schmidt-Filho, J.
    Mendrone-, A., Jr.
    Rocha, V.
    [J]. BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 54 (01) : 138 - 141