Karst breakdown mechanisms from observations in the gypsum caves of the Western Ukraine: implications for subsidence hazard assessment

被引:20
|
作者
Klimchouk, A
Andrejchuk, V
机构
[1] Natl Acad Sci Ukraine, Inst Geol Sci, UA-01030 Kiev, Ukraine
[2] Silesian Univ, Dept Earth Sci, Sosnovec, Poland
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY | 2005年 / 48卷 / 03期
关键词
karst subsidence; karst breakdown mechanisms; gypsum caves; speleogenesis; subsidence hazard assessment;
D O I
10.1007/s00254-005-1279-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The term karst breakdown is employed in this paper to denote the totality of processes and phenomena of gravitational and/or hydrodynamic destruction of the ceiling of a karst cavity and of the overlying sediments. It refers not only to the existence of a surface subsidence (collapse) feature but, first of all, to the "internal" (hidden in the subsurface) structures that precede development of a surface form. This study reports and discusses the results of direct mapping and examination of breakdown structures in the gypsum karst of the Western Ukraine, at the level of their origin, i.e., in caves. The accessibility of numerous laterally extensive maze cave systems in the region provided an excellent opportunity for such an approach, which made it possible to examine the relationship between breakdown structures and particular morphogenetic or geological features in caves, and to reveal stages of breakdown development. It is found that breakdown is initiated mainly at specific speleogenetically or geologically "weakened" localities, which classify into a few distinct types. The majority of breakdowns, which are potent to propagate through the overburden, relate with the outlet cupolas/domepits that represent places where water had discharged out of a cave to the upper aquifer during the period of transverse artesian speleogenesis. Distribution of breakdown structures does not correlate particularly well with the size of the master passages. Several distinct mechanisms of breakdown development are revealed, and most of them proceed in several stages. They are guided by speleogenetic, geological and hydrogeological factors. The study confirms that a speleogenetic approach is indispensable to the understanding of breakdown pre-requisites and mechanisms, as well as for eventual subsidence hazard assessment. Direct observations in caves, aimed both at speleogenetic investigation and breakdown characterization on regional- or site-specific levels, should be employed wherever possible.
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 359
页数:24
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Hydrochemistry and solution rates in gypsum karst: case study from the Western Ukraine
    Klimchouk, AB
    Aksem, SD
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2005, 48 (03): : 307 - 319
  • [2] Subsidence mechanisms and sedimentation in alluvial sinkholes inferred from trenching and ground penetrating radar (GPR). Implications for subsidence and flooding hazard assessment
    Fabregat, Ivan
    Gutierrez, Francisco
    Roque, Caries
    Zarroca, Mario
    Linares, Rogelio
    Comas, Xavier
    Guerrero, Jesus
    Carbonel, Domingo
    [J]. QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 525 : 1 - 15
  • [3] Earthquake slip estimation from the scarp geometry of Himalayan Frontal Thrust, western Himalaya: implications for seismic hazard assessment
    R. Jayangondaperumal
    J. L. Mugnier
    A. K. Dubey
    [J]. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 2013, 102 : 1937 - 1955
  • [4] Earthquake slip estimation from the scarp geometry of Himalayan Frontal Thrust, western Himalaya: implications for seismic hazard assessment
    Jayangondaperumal, R.
    Mugnier, J. L.
    Dubey, A. K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, 2013, 102 (07) : 1937 - 1955
  • [5] Ground-Motion Models for Seismic-Hazard Assessment in Western Iberia: Constraints from Instrumental Data and Intensity Observations
    Vilanova, Susana P.
    Fonseca, Joao F. B. D.
    Oliveira, Carlos S.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2012, 102 (01) : 169 - 184