Comparison of two approaches for differentiating full-field data in solid mechanics

被引:39
|
作者
Avril, Stephane [1 ]
Feissel, Pierre [2 ]
Pierron, Fabrice [3 ]
Villon, Pierre [2 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Natl Super Mines, CNRS, INSERM, Dept Hlth Sci & Engn,UMR 5146,IFR 143, F-42023 St Etienne 2, France
[2] UTC, Lab Roberval Mecan, F-60205 Compiegne, France
[3] Arts & Metiers Paristech, Lab Mecan & Procedes Fabricat, F-51006 Chalons Sur Marne, France
关键词
full-field measurements; numerical differentiation; measurement uncertainty; DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATION; HOLE TENSILE SPECIMENS; DISPLACEMENT-FIELDS; COMPOSITE-MATERIAL; DAMAGE PROCESS; SHEAROGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; DERIVATIVES; ERRORS;
D O I
10.1088/0957-0233/21/1/015703
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this study, the issue of reconstructing the gradients of noisy full-field data is addressed within the framework of solid mechanics. Two approaches are considered, a global one based on finite element approximation (FEA) and a local one based on diffuse approximation (DA). For both approaches, it is proposed to monitor locally the filtering effect in order to adapt the uncertainty to the local signal to noise ratio. Both approaches are applied to a case study which is commonly considered as difficult in solid mechanics (open-hole tensile test on a composite laminate). Both DA and FEA are successful for detecting local subsurface damage from the measured noisy displacement fields. Indications are also provided about the compared performances of DA and FEA. It is shown that DA is more robust, but the downside is that it is also more CPU time consuming.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Full-field OCT approaches clinical application
    Boccara, Claude
    [J]. LASER FOCUS WORLD, 2009, 45 (04): : 69 - 71
  • [2] Surface mechanics and full-field measurements for micromechanical sensors
    Amiot, Fabien
    Fedala, Yasmina
    Flammier, Cecile
    Garraud, Nicolas
    Kanoufi, Frederic
    Roger, Jean Paul
    Tessier, Gilles
    [J]. IUTAM SYMPOSIUM ON FULL-FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND IDENTIFICATION IN SOLID MECHANICS, 2011, 2012, 4 : 7 - 14
  • [3] Comparison of two full-field identification methods for the wedge splitting test on a refractory
    Vargas, R.
    Neggers, J.
    Canto, R. B.
    Rodrigues, J. A.
    Hild, F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2018, 38 (16) : 5569 - 5579
  • [4] Shape descriptors and mapping methods for full-field comparison of experimental to simulation data
    Pasialis, V.
    Lampeas, G.
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2015, 256 : 203 - 221
  • [5] A comparison of the components of the multifocal and full-field ERGs
    Hood, DC
    Seiple, W
    Holopigian, K
    Greenstein, V
    [J]. VISUAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1997, 14 (03) : 533 - 544
  • [6] New approaches to the full-field analysis of photoelastic stress patterns
    Buckberry, C
    Towers, D
    [J]. OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING, 1996, 24 (5-6) : 415 - 428
  • [7] Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data
    Celine M Vachon
    Erin EE Fowler
    Gail Tiffenberg
    Christopher G Scott
    V Shane Pankratz
    Thomas A Sellers
    John J Heine
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 15
  • [8] Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data
    Vachon, Celine M.
    Fowler, Erin E. E.
    Tiffenberg, Gail
    Scott, Christopher G.
    Pankratz, V. Shane
    Sellers, Thomas A.
    Heine, John J.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (01):
  • [9] Mechanics and full-field deformation study of the Ring Hoop Tension Test
    Dick, Chris P.
    Korkolis, Yannis P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2014, 51 (18) : 3042 - 3057
  • [10] Comparison of full-field digital mammography with CR mammography
    Uchiyama, N
    Kobayashi, H
    Tajima, H
    Machida, M
    Kumazaki, T
    Moriyama, N
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 119 - 119