Genetic and epigenetic variation in transposable element expression responses to abiotic stress in maize

被引:13
|
作者
Liang, Zhikai [1 ]
Anderson, Sarah N. [2 ]
Noshay, Jaclyn M. [1 ]
Crisp, Peter A. [3 ]
Enders, Tara A. [4 ]
Springer, Nathan M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Plant & Microbial Biol, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Genet Dev & Cell Biol, Ames, IA USA
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Agr & Food Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Hofstra Univ, Dept Biol, Hempstead, NY 11550 USA
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
RETROTRANSPOSONS; ALIGNMENT; ACTIVATION; RNA;
D O I
10.1093/plphys/kiab073
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Transposable elements (TEs) pervade most eukaryotic genomes. The repetitive nature of TEs complicates the analysis of their expression. Evaluation of the expression of both TE families (using unique and multi-mapping reads) and specific elements (using uniquely mapping reads) in leaf tissue of three maize (Zea mays) inbred lines subjected to heat or cold stress reveals no evidence for genome-wide activation of TEs; however, some specific TE families generate transcripts only in stress conditions. There is substantial variation for which TE families exhibit stress-responsive expression in the different genotypes. In order to understand the factors that drive expression of TEs, we focused on a subset of families in which we could monitor expression of individual elements. The stress-responsive activation of a TE family can often be attributed to a small number of elements in the family that contains regions lacking DNA methylation. Comparisons of the expression of TEs in different genotypes revealed both genetic and epigenetic variation. Many of the specific TEs that are activated in stress in one inbred are not present in the other inbred, explaining the lack of activation. Among the elements that are shared in both genomes but only expressed in one genotype, we found that many exhibit differences in DNA methylation such that the genotype without expression is fully methylated. This study provides insights into the regulation of expression of TEs in normal and stress conditions and highlights the role of chromatin variation between elements in a family or between genotypes for contributing to expression variation. The highly repetitive nature of many TEs complicates the analysis of their expression. Although most TEs are not expressed, some exhibits expression in certain tissues or conditions. We monitored the expression of both TE families (using unique and multi-mapping reads) and specific elements (using uniquely mapping reads) in leaf tissue of three maize (Zea mays) inbred lines subjected to heat or cold stress. While genome-wide activation of TEs did not occur, some TE families generated transcripts only in stress conditions with variation by genotype. To better understand the factors that drive expression of TEs, we focused on a subset of families in which we could monitor expression of individual elements. In most cases, stress-responsive activation of a TE family was attributed to a small number of elements in the family. The elements that contained small regions lacking DNA methylation regions showed enriched expression while fully methylated elements were rarely expressed in control or stress conditions. The cause of varied expression in the different genotypes was due to both genetic and epigenetic variation. Many specific TEs activated by stress in one inbred were not present in the other inbred. Among the elements shared in both genomes, full methylation inhibited expression in one of the genotypes. This study provides insights into the regulation of TE expression in normal and stress conditions and highlights the role of chromatin variation between elements in a family or between genotypes for contributing to expression.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 433
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Natural variation for gene expression responses to abiotic stress in maize
    Waters, Amanda J.
    Makarevitch, Irina
    Noshay, Jaclyn
    Burghardt, Liana T.
    Hirsch, Candice N.
    Hirsch, Cory D.
    Springer, Nathan M.
    [J]. PLANT JOURNAL, 2017, 89 (04): : 706 - 717
  • [2] Genetic and epigenetic variation of transposable elements in Arabidopsis
    Underwood, Charles J.
    Henderson, Ian R.
    Martienssen, Robert A.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY, 2017, 36 : 135 - 141
  • [3] Abiotic stress responses in maize: a review
    Ramazan Salika
    John Riffat
    [J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2021, 43
  • [4] Abiotic stress responses in maize: a review
    Salika, Ramazan
    Riffat, John
    [J]. ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM, 2021, 43 (09)
  • [5] Gene Expression and Stress Response Mediated by the Epigenetic Regulation of a Transposable Element Small RNA
    McCue, Andrea D.
    Nuthikattu, Saivageethi
    Reeder, Sarah H.
    Slotkin, R. Keith
    [J]. PLOS GENETICS, 2012, 8 (02):
  • [6] Epigenetic regulation in plant abiotic stress responses
    Chang, Ya-Nan
    Zhu, Chen
    Jiang, Jing
    Zhang, Huiming
    Zhu, Jian-Kang
    Duan, Cheng-Guo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE PLANT BIOLOGY, 2020, 62 (05) : 563 - 580
  • [7] Epigenetic regulation in plant abiotic stress responses
    Ya-Nan Chang
    Chen Zhu
    Jing Jiang
    Huiming Zhang
    Jian-Kang Zhu
    Cheng-Guo Duan
    [J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2020, 62 (05) : 563 - 580
  • [8] Epigenetic regulation of abiotic stress responses in plants
    Shilpa
    Thakur, Rajnikant
    Prasad, Pramod
    [J]. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS, 2024, 1868 (09):
  • [9] Transposable Elements Contribute to Activation of Maize Genes in Response to Abiotic Stress
    Makarevitch, Irina
    Waters, Amanda J.
    West, Patrick T.
    Stitzer, Michelle
    Hirsch, Candice N.
    Ross-Ibarra, Jeffrey
    Springer, Nathan M.
    [J]. PLOS GENETICS, 2015, 11 (01):
  • [10] Genomic imbalance modulates transposable element expression in maize
    Yang, Hua
    Shi, Xiaowen
    Chen, Chen
    Hou, Jie
    Ji, Tieming
    Cheng, Jianlin
    Birchler, James A.
    [J]. PLANT COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 4 (02)