Subjective Image Quality Assessment With Boosted Triplet Comparisons

被引:20
|
作者
Men, Hui [1 ]
Lin, Hanhe [1 ]
Jenadeleh, Mohsen [1 ]
Saupe, Dietmar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Konstanz, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, D-78464 Constance, Germany
关键词
Image reconstruction; Image quality; Distortion; Streaming media; Sensitivity; Visualization; Quality assessment; Subjective quality assessment; full-reference; artefact amplification; zooming; flicker test; triplet comparisons; scale reconstruction; just noticeable difference; COMPRESSION;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3118295
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In subjective full-reference image quality assessment, a reference image is distorted at increasing distortion levels. The differences between perceptual image qualities of the reference image and its distorted versions are evaluated, often using degradation category ratings (DCR). However, the DCR has been criticized since differences between rating categories on this ordinal scale might not be perceptually equidistant, and observers may have different understandings of the categories. Pair comparisons (PC) of distorted images, followed by Thurstonian reconstruction of scale values, overcomes these problems. In addition, PC is more sensitive than DCR, and it can provide scale values in fractional, just noticeable difference (JND) units that express a precise perceptional interpretation. Still, the comparison of images of nearly the same quality can be difficult. We introduce boosting techniques embedded in more general triplet comparisons (TC) that increase the sensitivity even more. Boosting amplifies the artefacts of distorted images, enlarges their visual representation by zooming, increases the visibility of the distortions by a flickering effect, or combines some of the above. Experimental results show the effectiveness of boosted TC for seven types of distortion (color diffusion, jitter, high sharpen, JPEG 2000 compression, lens blur, motion blur, multiplicative noise). For our study, we crowdsourced over 1.7 million responses to triplet questions. We give a detailed analysis of the data in terms of scale reconstructions, accuracy, detection rates, and sensitivity gain. Generally, boosting increases the discriminatory power and allows to reduce the number of subjective ratings without sacrificing the accuracy of the resulting relative image quality values. Our technique paves the way to fine-grained image quality datasets, allowing for more distortion levels, yet with high-quality subjective annotations. We also provide the details for Thurstonian scale reconstruction from TC and our annotated dataset, KonFiG-IQA, containing 10 source images, processed using 7 distortion types at 12 or even 30 levels, uniformly spaced over a span of 3 JND units.
引用
收藏
页码:138939 / 138975
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Subjective Image Quality Assessment Optimization
    Lewandowska , Anna
    IMAGE PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS CHALLENGES 8, 2017, 525 : 171 - 178
  • [2] Performance Comparisons of Subjective Quality Assessment Methods for Video
    Tominaga, Toshiko
    Masuda, Masataka
    Okamoto, Jun
    Takahashi, Akira
    Hayashi, Takanori
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2014, E97B (01) : 66 - 75
  • [3] An Image Quality Dataset with Triplet Comparisons for Multi-dimensional Scaling
    Jenadeleh, Mohsen
    Dennig, Frederik L.
    Cuturat, Rene
    Ngot, Quynh Quang
    Keim, Daniel A.
    Sedlmair, Michael
    Saupe, Dietmar
    2024 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUALITY OF MULTIMEDIA EXPERIENCE, QOMEX 2024, 2024, : 278 - 281
  • [4] A Matlab Tool for Subjective Assessment of Image Quality
    Han, Dongxu
    Zhong, Baojiang
    2018 CHINESE AUTOMATION CONGRESS (CAC), 2018, : 3323 - 3328
  • [6] Subjective Quality Assessment of Stereoscopic Omnidirectional Image
    Xu, Jiahua
    Lin, Chaoyi
    Zhou, Wei
    Chen, Zhibo
    ADVANCES IN MULTIMEDIA INFORMATION PROCESSING, PT I, 2018, 11164 : 589 - 599
  • [7] Subjective image quality assessment at the threshold level
    White, C.
    Martin, R.
    Wu, D.
    Tan, C. S.
    Tan, D. M.
    Wu, H. R.
    Cai, J.
    TENCON 2005 - 2005 IEEE REGION 10 CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, 2006, : 785 - +
  • [8] Multiple Image Arrangement for Subjective Quality Assessment
    Wang Y.
    Zhai G.
    Wang, Yan (yanwang@sjtu.edu.cn), 2017, Springer Science and Business Media, LLC (18):
  • [9] Active Sampling for Subjective Image Quality Assessment
    Ye, Peng
    Doermann, David
    2014 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2014, : 4249 - 4256
  • [10] Subjective Image Quality Assessment for Large Samples
    Liu Yang
    Jiang Runqiang
    Yu Hongjun
    Chen Jian
    LASER & OPTOELECTRONICS PROGRESS, 2019, 56 (13)