Playing the collaboration game right -: balancing trust and contracting

被引:177
|
作者
Blomqvist, K
Hurmelinna, P
Seppänen, R
机构
[1] Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Telecom Business Res Ctr, FIN-53851 Lappeenranta, Finland
[2] Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Dept Business Adm, FIN-53851 Lappeenranta, Finland
关键词
trust; contract; asymmetry; R&D; collaboration;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2004.09.001
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In today's knowledge-based global competitive climate, both large and small firms attempt to leverage external knowledge by collaborating with companies with complementary knowledge and resources. Academics and practitioners agree that in the global network era knowledge has become a key resource for continuous innovation and competitiveness. The issues of trust, social capital and the management of intellectual property have also attracted more attention in terms of knowledge creation. However, trust, intellectual property and contracts are seldom discussed simultaneously. This paper focuses on the roles of trust and contracts in asymmetric R&D collaboration. We begin by reviewing the state-of-the-art literature on these roles in interfirm collaboration, and continue by examining the potential for balancing trust and contracting in a case study in which a small firm collaborates with a large, global machinery and equipment supplier. We conclude that an understanding of the roles and dynamics of contracts and trust is critical for R&D collaboration. Contracts as such cannot guarantee successful collaboration, but the contracting process may be used purposefully to increase mutual understanding and learning, and to build up trust. We also offer some managerial recommendations on how to balance trust and contracting in asymmetric R&D collaboration. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 504
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Playing both roles in the trust game
    Burks, SV
    Carpenter, JP
    Verhoogen, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2003, 51 (02) : 195 - 216
  • [2] ARE WE PLAYING THE RIGHT CALIBRATION GAME
    GREAVES, P
    [J]. CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION, 1994, 26 (04): : 13 - 13
  • [3] Korea's Balancing Act: Playing the Long Game
    Oliver, Irvin
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF DEFENSE ANALYSIS, 2013, 25 (02): : 211 - 225
  • [4] Balancing game universes for playing without sight or hearing
    Westin, Thomas
    Furostam, Malin
    Yasasindhu, Roy
    Norberg, Lena
    Wiklund, Mats
    Mozelius, Peter
    [J]. ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY: BUILDING BRIDGES, 2015, 217 : 372 - 377
  • [5] Playing the 'Trust Game' with Robots: Social Strategies and Experiences
    Mota, Roberta C. Ramos
    Rea, Daniel J.
    Le Tran, Anna
    Young, James E.
    Sharlin, Ehud
    Sousa, Mario C.
    [J]. 2016 25TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION (RO-MAN), 2016, : 519 - 524
  • [6] Playing the trust game with other people's money
    Kvaloy, Ola
    Luzuriaga, Miguel
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 17 (04) : 615 - 630
  • [7] Playing the trust game with other people’s money
    Ola Kvaløy
    Miguel Luzuriaga
    [J]. Experimental Economics, 2014, 17 : 615 - 630
  • [8] Balancing immunosuppression in pediatric liver transplantation: Playing the long game
    Antala, Swati
    DiNorcia, Joseph
    Bucuvalas, John
    [J]. PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 27 (08)
  • [9] The establishment of game playing and trust relationship in finance outsourcing partners
    Liu Xiaofeng
    Hui Xiaofeng
    [J]. MODERN FINANCE AND GLOBAL TRADING COOPERATION: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON WTO AND FINANCIAL ENGINEERING, 2008, : 312 - 315
  • [10] Trust, trustworthiness and social networks: Playing a trust game when networks are formed in the lab
    Di Cagno, Daniela
    Sciubba, Emanuela
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2010, 75 (02) : 156 - 167