Impact of firm characteristics and ownership structure on firm efficiency: evidence from non-financial firms of Pakistan

被引:3
|
作者
Habib, Shafaat Muhammad [1 ]
Hussain, Haroon [2 ]
Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh [3 ,4 ]
Hussain, Rana Yassir [5 ]
机构
[1] Super Coll Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan
[2] Univ Sargodha, Noon Business Sch, Sargodha, Pakistan
[3] Univ Portsmouth, Fac Business & Law, Dept Accounting & Financial Management, Portsmouth, Hants, England
[4] Econ & Finance, Riyadh, Lahore, Saudi Arabia
[5] Univ Educ Lahore Portsmouth & Riyadh, Dept Econ & Business Adm, Lahore, Pakistan
来源
COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE | 2022年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
firm Efficiency; DEA; cash holdings; book-to-market ratio; negative book-to-market ratio; EXCESS CASH HOLDINGS; BOOK-TO-MARKET; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; CAPITAL STRUCTURE; EQUITY OWNERSHIP; INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE; STOCK PERFORMANCE; SHAREHOLDER VALUE; SLACK RESOURCES; CROSS-SECTION;
D O I
10.1080/23322039.2022.2106628
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study aims to examine the impact of firm characteristics and ownership structure on the firm efficiency of listed non-financial firms in Pakistan from 2012 to 2017. Firm characteristics include market capitalization, cash holdings, book-to-market ratio and negative book-to-market ratio and ownership structure includes insider ownership, institutional ownership and concentration ownership while controlling for firm size, profitability, leverage and age. Data related to firm efficiency, cash holdings, book-to-market ratio and negative book-to-market ratio was collected from Financial Statement Analysis published by SBP whereas data related to market capitalization and ownership structure (insider ownership, institutional ownership and concentration ownership) was collected from business recorder and published annual reports respectively. At first stage the firm efficiency is reported by using DEA CRS approach and results show that the year 2014 was the best year because 24% firms were efficient and 2015 was the worst because only 18% firms were efficient. The results also show that textile, sugar, food, manufacturing, chemical & pharmaceuticals, cement, motor vehicle, information communication & transportation are the poor performing sectors of Pakistan. This inefficiency might be due to the inefficient use of resources as agency theory advocates. Then at second stage, the correlation and variance inflation factor did not show any multicollinearity. Tobit model is used to find the regression results. The regression results show that market capitalization, cash holdings and concentration ownership positively and significantly influence the firm efficiency. Negative book-to-market ratio, insider ownership and institutional ownership negatively and significantly influence the firm efficiency whereas the book-to-market ratio is insignificant with the firm efficiency. It might be due to the self-interest by the insider and institutional ownership. This study is also helpful for the investors. They can choose the efficient firm for investment and to avoid the inefficient firms to stay away from the losses.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Firm performance, ownership, and securitization: evidence from non-financial firms in China
    Lin, Qiang
    He, Zhongzhi
    Li, Bin
    Liu, Zhiwang
    [J]. REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING, 2024,
  • [2] FIRM CHARACTERISTICS AND FINANCIAL REPORTING QUALITY: EVIDENCE FROM NON-FINANCIAL FIRMS IN NIGERIA
    Soyemi, Kenny Adedapo
    Olawale, Luqman Samuel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTING, 2019, 27 (02): : 445 - 472
  • [3] Does promoters' ownership reduce the firm's financial distress? Evidence from non-financial firms listed in India
    Kanoujiya, Jagjeevan
    Singh, Kuldeep
    Rastogi, Shailesh
    [J]. MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2023, 49 (04) : 643 - 660
  • [4] The Impact of Enterprise Risk Management on Firm Value: Empirical Evidence from Romanian Non-Financial Firms
    Anton, Sorin Gabriel
    [J]. INZINERINE EKONOMIKA-ENGINEERING ECONOMICS, 2018, 29 (02): : 151 - 157
  • [5] Impact of Ownership Type, Firm Characteristics and Crisis on Efficiency of the Czech Firms
    Hanousek, Jan
    Kocenda, Evzen
    [J]. POLITICKA EKONOMIE, 2017, 65 (01) : 3 - 25
  • [6] EFFECTS OF FAMILY CONTROL ON FIRM VALUE AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM NON-FINANCIAL SECTOR OF PAKISTAN
    Zulfiqar, Muhammad
    Kashif, Muhammad Tayyab
    Khurshid, Muhammad Kashif
    Mahmood, Shahid
    Saqib, Shahnawaz
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTION JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCES & TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 11 (01):
  • [7] Carbon Emissions and Firm Performance: Evidence from Financial and Non-Financial Firms from Selected Emerging Economies
    Miah, Mohammad Dulal
    Hasan, Rashedul
    Usman, Mohammed
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (23)
  • [8] Impact of Corporate Governance on the Likelihood of Financial Distress: Evidence from Non-Financial Firms of Pakistan
    Khurshid, Muhammad Kashif
    Sabir, Hazoor Muhammad
    Tahir, Safdar Hussain
    Abrar, Muhammad
    [J]. PACIFIC BUSINESS REVIEW INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 11 (04): : 134 - 149
  • [9] Does trade credit spur performance of the firm: a case study of non-financial firms in Pakistan
    Asif, Rabia
    Nisar, Sabahat
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2023, 14 (05) : 718 - 739
  • [10] Corporate governance and firm performance: in Qatari non-financial firms
    Al-Shaer, Basel
    Aldboush, Hassan H. H.
    Alnajjar, Ahmad H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2024,