Emergy evaluation of combined heat and power plant processes

被引:48
|
作者
Sha, Sha [1 ]
Hurme, Markku [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Sch Chem Technol, Aalto 00076, Finland
关键词
Emergy analysis; Sustainability CHP; Biomass; Coal; Independent production; ECO-INDUSTRIAL PARK; ENERGY ANALYSIS; CHP; SYSTEMS; INDEXES; RATIOS;
D O I
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.11.063
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
An energy-focused environmental accounting method based on the embodied solar energy (emergy) principle was used for evaluating biomass and coal-based combined heat and power (CHP) cogeneration processes. The emergy method expresses all the resources needed (fuel, investment, labor etc.) as solar energy equivalents. The method looks at sustainability from the point of view of the biosphere. In fact, emergy aims to be a 'memory' of how much work the biosphere has done to provide a product. Biomass and coal-based CHP alternatives were compared with independent production of heat & power. It was found that biomass-based cogeneration is 3.3 times more emergy-efficient than coal-based independent production; i.e. the biosphere needed to work 77% less for biomass CHP produced heat & power compared to that produced independently from coal. Cogeneration from the same fuel was in all cases 0.3 times more emergy-efficient than independent production. In general heat and power production from biomass is 2.3 times more emergy-efficient than that from coal in a similar process. The emergy sustainability index shows a similar trend, e.g. the sustainability index of a biomass CHP plant is 15 times higher than that of a coal CHP plant. The fuel, its transport, and the oxygen in air used for burning account for over 80% of the emergy in biomass CHP whereas in a coal-based process the share is over 90%. The share of capital is quite small in terms of total emergy. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 74
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Emergy evaluation of combined heat and power plant eco-industrial park (CHP plant EIP)
    Wang, Lingmei
    Ni, Weidou
    Li, Zheng
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2006, 48 (01) : 56 - 70
  • [2] Should a small combined heat and power plant (CHP) open to its regional power and heat networks? Integrated economic, energy, and emergy evaluation of optimization plans for Jiufa CHP
    Peng, T.
    Lu, H. F.
    Wu, W. L.
    Campbell, D. E.
    Zhao, G. S.
    Zou, J. H.
    Chen, J.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2008, 33 (03) : 437 - 445
  • [3] Emergy evaluation of Eco-Industrial Park with Power Plant
    Wang, LM
    Zhang, JT
    Ni, WD
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2005, 189 (1-2) : 233 - 240
  • [4] An Evaluation Method of Wind Power Integration in Power Systems with Flexible Combined Heat and Power Plant
    Lyu, Quan
    Gong, Haoyan
    Yang, Nan
    Xu, Xiandong
    Zhang, Na
    Wang, Haixia
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (21)
  • [5] Reuse as a Combined Heat and Power Plant
    Reinhart, Christoph
    [J]. DENKMALPFLEGE, 2016, 74 (02): : 211 - 213
  • [6] Integrated emergy and economic evaluation of a case tidal power plant in China
    Zhang, L. X.
    Tang, S. J.
    Hao, Y.
    Pang, M. Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 182 : 38 - 45
  • [7] EVALUATION OF THE OPTIMUM HYBRID POWER TO HEAT CONFIGURATION FOR A GAS TURBINE BASED INDUSTRIAL COMBINED HEAT AND POWER PLANT
    Klein, Sikke
    van Deursen, Femke
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBOMACHINERY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2019, VOL 3, 2019,
  • [8] Performance evaluation of adding ethanol production into an existing combined heat and power plant
    Starfelt, F.
    Thorin, E.
    Dotzauer, E.
    Yan, J.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (02) : 613 - 618
  • [9] Economic evaluation of improvements in a waste-to-energy combined heat and power plant
    Eboh, Francis Chinweuba
    Andersson, Bengt-Ake
    Richards, Tobias
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 100 : 75 - 83
  • [10] Emergy evaluation of water treatment processes
    Arbault, Damien
    Rugani, Benedetto
    Tiruta-Barna, Ligia
    Benetto, Enrico
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 60 : 172 - 182