Topotecan as second-line therapy for ovarian cancer: Dosage versus toxicity

被引:13
|
作者
Markman, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
ONCOLOGIST | 2005年 / 10卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
10.1634/theoncologist.10-9-695
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In this issue of The Oncologist, Armstrong et al. present an analysis of the use of topotecan (Hycamtin (R); Glaxo-SmithKline, Philadelphia, http://www.gsk.com) in the second-line treatment of both ovarian cancer and small cell carcinoma of the lung. This cytotoxic agent has clearly been demonstrated to be a useful drug in a population of patients with both of these conditions. However, the description of the nature of the toxicity, as stated in the manuscript, must be questioned along with comments made regarding the relative toxicity of alternative cytotoxic agents frequently used in similar settings. The purpose of this discussion absolutely is not to negate the unquestioned, demonstrated usefulness of topotecan as second-line therapy in ovarian cancer but rather to point out that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved dose level of 1.5 mg/m(2) per day x 5 days can cause substantial and highly clinically relevant bone marrow toxicity. Whether this toxicity, which can result in a level of fatigue that may cause responding patients to discontinue treatment, should simply be labeled "excessive" rather than "cumulative" appears to be a matter of semantics rather than an important distinction. Whether delivery of a lower dose of topotecan (1 mg/m(2) - 1.25 mg/m(2) per day x 5 days) will essentially eliminate concern for the development of severe clinically relevant marrow toxicity is uncertain, but the risk will certainly be substantially reduced.
引用
收藏
页码:695 / 697
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Second-line treatment with Topotecan in ovarian cancer
    Morales, S
    Balil, A
    Salud, A
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 35 : S87 - S87
  • [2] The role of topotecan as second-line therapy in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer
    Beshara, N
    Fung, MFK
    Faught, W
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 23 (04) : 287 - 290
  • [4] Weekly administration of topotecan–paclitaxel as second-line treatment in ovarian cancer
    G. P. Stathopoulos
    N. A. Malamos
    G. Aravantinos
    S. Rigatos
    Ch. Christodoulou
    J. Stathopoulos
    D. Skarlos
    [J]. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2007, 60 : 123 - 128
  • [5] Independent radiological review of a phase III study of topotecan versus paclitaxel as second-line therapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Gwyther, SJ
    Gore, M
    Huinink, WT
    Fields, SZ
    Hudson, I
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 33 : 533 - 533
  • [6] Weekly administration of topotecan-paclitaxel as second-line treatment in ovarian cancer
    Stathopoulos, G. P.
    Malamos, N. A.
    Aravantinos, G.
    Rigatos, S.
    Christodoulou, Ch.
    Stathopoulos, J.
    Skarlos, D.
    [J]. CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 60 (01) : 123 - 128
  • [7] The role of anthracyclines in second-line therapy of ovarian cancer
    Vermorken, JB
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2003, 13 : 178 - 184
  • [8] Treosulfan as an effective second-line therapy in ovarian cancer
    Gropp, M
    Meier, W
    Hepp, H
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1998, 71 (01) : 94 - 98
  • [9] Treosulfan as an effective second-line therapy in ovarian cancer
    Gropp, M
    Meier, W
    Hepp, H
    [J]. GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 1997, 57 (06) : 356 - 360
  • [10] Topotecan in second-line therapy of SCLC: Impact on survival?
    Huber, RM
    Gatzemeier, U
    Gosse, H
    von Pawel, J
    Hruska, D
    Mezger, J
    Saal, JG
    Kleinschmidt, R
    Steppert, C
    Steppling, H
    [J]. ONKOLOGIE, 2000, 23 : 9 - 12