Evaluating Offsite Technologies for Affordable Housing

被引:17
|
作者
Nanyam, V. P. S. Nihar [1 ]
Sawhney, Anil [2 ]
Gupta, Prateek Arun [1 ]
机构
[1] RICS Sch Built Environm, Noida, UP, India
[2] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Dept Built Environm, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
关键词
Offsite Technologies; Affordable Housing; attributes; selection framework; CONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.183
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Availability of an attribute-based evaluation and selection system for offsite technologies is crucial for the adoption of these technologies in mass housing projects. Due to this gap, adoption of offsite technologies remains low in the Indian construction industry in spite of a huge requirement of 18.78 million housing units to be built by 2022. The traditional osticks and bricksN approach is not likely to fulfil this demand. Adoption of offsite technologies has to be looked into as an option to deliver the extensive requirement in the area of affordable housing. Rejection of technology by evaluating the first cost alone is not the desired strategy to evaluate these offsite technologies. To evaluate and adopt these offsite technologies in affordable housing segment, a holistic selection framework encompassing a set of attributes is needed. This paper identifies a holistic selection framework with a set of offsite specific attributes alongside a set of standard attributes that are mandatory and desired for the adoption of offsite technologies in the affordable housing. Simple scoring of attributes is utilized in devising the framework. This framework is tested and validated on a case study where offsite technologies are used. (c) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 143
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of In-Lieu Fees and Offsite Construction as Incentives for Affordable Housing Production
    Porter, Douglas R.
    Davison, Elizabeth B.
    [J]. CITYSCAPE, 2009, 11 (02) : 27 - 59
  • [2] Offsite construction supply chain strategies for matching affordable rental housing demand: A system dynamics approach
    MacAskill, Stefen
    Mostafa, Sherif
    Stewart, Rodney A.
    Sahin, Oz
    Suprun, Emiliya
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2021, 73
  • [3] Selection framework for evaluating housing technologies
    Nanyam, V. P. S. Nihar
    Basu, Riddha
    Sawhney, Anil
    Prasad, J. K.
    [J]. CREATIVE CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE 2015, SELECTED PAPERS, 2015, 123 : 333 - 341
  • [4] AFFORDABLE HOUSING SOLUTIONS: AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROVIDERS' PERSPECTIVE
    Susilawati, Connie
    Armitage, Lynne
    [J]. PACIFIC RIM PROPERTY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2010, 16 (03) : 273 - 290
  • [5] Indicator based sustainability assessment tool for affordable housing construction technologies
    Wallbaum, H.
    Ostermeyer, Y.
    Salzer, C.
    Escamilla, E. Zea
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 18 : 353 - 364
  • [6] Affordable Housing
    Pearce, Barry
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN PLANNER, 2005, 42 (04) : 33 - 33
  • [7] AFFORDABLE HOUSING
    BOLES, DD
    [J]. PROGRESSIVE ARCHITECTURE, 1987, 68 (02): : 86 - 91
  • [8] AFFORDABLE HOUSING
    BHATTACHARYA, KP
    [J]. ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL WEEKLY, 1994, 29 (09) : 454 - 454
  • [9] Evaluating Equity: A Method for Analyzing the Transit Accessibility of Affordable Housing Units
    Guo, Jing
    Brakewood, Candace
    Hightower, Ashley
    Cherry, Christopher
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2024, 2678 (03) : 668 - 686
  • [10] How Affordable Is HUD Affordable Housing?
    Hamidi, Shima
    Ewing, Reid
    Renne, John
    [J]. HOUSING POLICY DEBATE, 2016, 26 (03) : 437 - 455