Double-blind, Randomized placebo controlled trial of fulvestrant compared with exemestane after prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer: Results from EFECT

被引:383
|
作者
Chia, Stephen [1 ]
Gradishar, William
Mauriac, Louis
Bines, Jose
Amant, Frederic
Federico, Miriam
Fein, Luis
Romieu, Gilles
Buzdar, Aman
Robertson, John F. R.
Brufsky, Adam
Possinger, Kurt
Rennie, Pamela
Sapunar, Francisco
Lowe, Elizabeth
Piccart, Martine
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, British Columbia Canc Agcy, Div Med Oncol, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2007.13.5822
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The third-generation nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are increasingly used as adjuvant and first-line advanced therapy for postmenopausal, hormone receptor-positive (HR +) breast cancer. Because many patients subsequently experience progression or relapse, it is important to identify agents with efficacy after AI failure. Materials and Methods Evaluation of Faslodex versus Exemestane Clinical Trial (EFECT) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, multicenter phase III trial of fulvestrant versus exemestane in postmenopausal women with HR + advanced breast cancer (ABC) progressing or recurring after nonsteroidal AI. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP). A fulvestrant loading-dose (LD) regimen was used: 500 mg intramuscularly on day 0, 250 mg on days 14, 28, and 250 mg every 28 days thereafter. Exemestane 25 mg orally was administered once daily. Results A total of 693 women were randomly assigned to fulvestrant (n = 351) or exemestane ( n = 342). Approximately 60% of patients had received at least two prior endocrine therapies. Median TTP was 3.7 months in both groups ( hazard ratio = 0.963; 95% CI, 0.819 to 1.133; P = .6531). The overall response rate ( 7.4% v 6.7%; P = .736) and clinical benefit rate ( 32.2% v 31.5%; P = .853) were similar between fulvestrant and exemestane respectively. Median duration of clinical benefit was 9.3 and 8.3 months, respectively. Both treatments were well tolerated, with no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events or quality of life. Pharmacokinetic data confirm that steady-state was reached within 1 month with the LD schedule of fulvestrant. Conclusion Fulvestrant LD and exemestane are equally active and well-tolerated in a meaningful proportion of postmenopausal women with ABC who have experienced progression or recurrence during treatment with a nonsteroidal AI.
引用
收藏
页码:1664 / 1670
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized, controlled phase II trial of exemestane compared with medroxyprogesterone after nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer
    Wang, T.
    Huang, H.
    Zhang, S.
    Bian, L.
    Jiang, Z.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15)
  • [2] Phase II randomized trial of toremifene 120 mg compared with exemestane 25 mg after prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.
    Iwase, Hirotaka
    Yamamoto, Yutaka
    Ishikawa, Takashi
    Hozumi, Yasuo
    Ikeda, Masahiko
    Iwata, Hiroji
    Yamashita, Hiroko
    Toyama, Tatsuya
    Chishima, Takashi
    Kimijima, Izo
    Ibusuki, Mutsuko
    Saji, Shigehira
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (27)
  • [3] Fulvestrant versus exemestane following prior non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy: first results from EFECT, a randomized, phase III trial in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.
    Gradishar, W. J.
    Chia, S.
    Piccart-Gebhart, M. J.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2006, 100 : S8 - S9
  • [4] Ganitumab with either exemestane or fulvestrant for postmenopausal women with advanced, hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer: a randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 2 trial
    Robertson, John F. R.
    Ferrero, Jean-Marc
    Bourgeois, Hugues
    Kennecke, Hagen
    de Boer, Richard H.
    Jacot, William
    McGreivy, Jesse
    Suzuki, Samuel
    Zhu, Min
    McCaffery, Ian
    Loh, Elwyn
    Gansert, Jennifer L.
    Kaufman, Peter A.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (03): : 228 - 235
  • [5] Randomized Phase II, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Exemestane With or Without Entinostat in Postmenopausal Women With Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Progressing on Treatment With a Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor
    Yardley, Denise A.
    Ismail-Khan, Roohi R.
    Melichar, Bohuslav
    Lichinitser, Mikhail
    Munster, Pamela N.
    Klein, Pamela M.
    Cruickshank, Scott
    Miller, Kathy D.
    Lee, Min J.
    Trepel, Jane B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (17) : 2128 - +
  • [6] Randomized controlled trial of toremifene 120 mg compared with exemestane 25 mg after prior treatment with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer
    Yamamoto, Yutaka
    Ishikawa, Takashi
    Hozumi, Yasuo
    Ikeda, Masahiko
    Iwata, Hiroji
    Yamashita, Hiroko
    Toyama, Tatsuya
    Chishima, Takashi
    Saji, Shigehira
    Yamamoto-Ibusuki, Mutsuko
    Iwase, Hirotaka
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2013, 13
  • [7] Randomized controlled trial of toremifene 120 mg compared with exemestane 25 mg after prior treatment with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer
    Yutaka Yamamoto
    Takashi Ishikawa
    Yasuo Hozumi
    Masahiko Ikeda
    Hiroji Iwata
    Hiroko Yamashita
    Tatsuya Toyama
    Takashi Chishima
    Shigehira Saji
    Mutsuko Yamamoto-Ibusuki
    Hirotaka Iwase
    [J]. BMC Cancer, 13
  • [8] Tucidinostat plus exemestane for postmenopausal patients with advanced, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (ACE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
    Jiang, Zefei
    Li, Wei
    Hu, Xichun
    Zhang, Qingyuan
    Sun, Tao
    Cui, Shude
    Wang, Shusen
    Ouyang, Quchang
    Yin, Yongmei
    Geng, Cuizhi
    Tong, Zhongsheng
    Cheng, Ying
    Pan, Yueyin
    Sun, Yuping
    Wang, Hong
    Ouyang, Tao
    Gu, Kangsheng
    Feng, Jifeng
    Wang, Xiaojia
    Wang, Shubin
    Liu, Tianshu
    Gao, Jinghua
    Cristofanilli, Massimo
    Ning, Zhiqiang
    Lu, Xianping
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (06): : 806 - 815
  • [9] Results of ENCORE 301, a randomized, phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of exemestane with or without entinostat in postmenopausal women with locally recurrent or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive (ER plus ) breast cancer progressing on a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (AI).
    Yardley, D. A.
    Ismail-Khan, R.
    Klein, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (27)
  • [10] Phase III, double-blind, controlled trial of atamestane plus Toremifene compared with letrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced receptor-positive breast cancer
    Goss, Paul
    Bondarenko, Igor N.
    Manikhas, Georgiy N.
    Pendergrass, Kelly B.
    Miller, Wilson H., Jr.
    Langecker, Peter
    Blanchett, Dennis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (31) : 4961 - 4966