Impoverished economics? A critical assessment of the new gold standard

被引:12
|
作者
Kvangraven, Ingrid Harvold [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, York, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
POVERTY; TRIALS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104813
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This article situates the 2019 Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel in the history of thought on development, tracing how the focus, theory and methods have shifted in the field. The article evaluates theoretical and methodological critiques of the way randomized control trials (RCTs) are employed by the laureates, as well as attempts to overcome these challenges. In terms of theory, the article demonstrates what gets lost when experiments are guided by methodological individualism and assumptions of individual utility-maximizing behavior. In terms of methodology, the article unpacks the limits of RCTs related to their causal model, and their lack of attention to human agency and wider socio-economic context. Finally, the article discusses the experimental approach's relevance for research and policy-making and cautions against any approach becoming a "gold standard," due to the importance of pluralism for maintaining an open debate about development. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条