Management of cervical cerclage at term: remove the suture in labor?

被引:17
|
作者
Abdelhak, YE [1 ]
Aronov, R [1 ]
Rogue, H [1 ]
Young, BK [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med,Div Maternal Fetal Med, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
Cervical cerclage; Cervical dystocia; Cervical incompetence; Cervical laceration; Shirodkar;
D O I
10.1515/JPM.2000.061
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the risks and benefits to patients who carry to term after undergoing a Shirodkar cerclage where the cerclage is not removed until the patient presents in labor. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted examining all patients who underwent a Shirodkar cerclage employing a 5 mm Mersilene band. All the cerclages were placed by a single operator over a twenty five year span, from 1/01/74 till 10/01/98. Only patients who delivered vaginally or were allowed a trial of labor were included. In all cases, the cerclage was removed under regional anesthesia after the patient presented to the hospital in labor. Results: Ninety six cerclage procedures were performed over that period. Eighty two pregnancies qualifled for review. Sixty two patients delivered vaginally (76%). Nine cesareans were indicated for failure to progress in labor (11%) with cervical dystocia possibly implicated in one. There were no cases of ruptured uteri or the development of uterine windows. Of the 82 pregnancies there were five cases (6%) of minor cervical laceration. Conclusion: Allowing patients to proceed to labor with a Shirodkar cerclage in place, does not increase the risks of cervical dystocia, cervical laceration, or uterine rupture above the reported incidence for these complications in patients in whom the cerclage is removed prophylactically.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 457
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Suture choice for cervical cerclage
    McDonald, Sarah D.
    Murphy, Kellie E.
    [J]. LANCET, 2022, 400 (10361): : 1385 - 1387
  • [2] Suture thickness and transvaginal cervical cerclage outcomes
    Battarbee, Ashley N.
    Pfister, Abbey
    Manuck, Tracy A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2019, 1 (04)
  • [3] Posterior suture avulsion following cervical cerclage
    Windrim, C. M.
    Kingdom, J.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 39 (03) : 359 - 360
  • [4] The effect of cervical cerclage on the labor curve
    Onishi, Kazuma
    Huang, Jim C.
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2023, 5 (04)
  • [5] The impact of cervical cerclage on labor morbidity
    Rebarber, A
    Roman, A
    Saltzman, D
    Mulholland, J
    Bender, S
    Koklanaris, N
    Roshan, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (06) : S209 - S209
  • [6] THE EFFECT OF CERVICAL CERCLAGE ON THE COURSE OF LABOR
    WEISSMAN, A
    JAKOBI, P
    ZAHI, S
    ZIMMER, EZ
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 76 (02): : 168 - 171
  • [7] Is the prior placement of cervical cerclage associated with adverse outcomes in subsequent term labor?
    Bauer, Alison M.
    Lappen, Justin R.
    Hackney, David N.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S611 - S611
  • [8] A Comparison of Mersilene Suture to Other Non-Absorbable Suture in Cervical Cerclage
    Childress, Katherine M.
    Dickert, Erin J.
    Flick, Amy A.
    Myles, Thomas D.
    Amon, Erol
    Gross, Gilad A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 127 : 68S - 69S
  • [9] Effect of Cervical Cerclage Suture Type on Pregnancy Outcomes.
    Kazzi, Nayla G.
    Hesson, Ashley
    Langen, Elizabeth S.
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 1) : 128A - 128A
  • [10] Cervical Cerclage: Does the Location of the Suture Placement Make a Difference?
    Petrikovsky, Boris
    Terrani, Michael
    Swancoat, Steven
    Dillon, Alison
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY, 2018, 34 (01) : 16 - 19