Critical crack tip opening displacement of different strength concrete

被引:5
|
作者
Wang Bing [1 ,2 ]
Zhang Xiu-fang [1 ]
Dai Jian-guo [3 ]
Xu Shi-lang [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Fac Infrastruct Engn, Civil Engn Inst, Dalian 116023, Peoples R China
[2] Commun Res Inst Liaoning Prov, Shenyang 110015, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Struct Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Civil Engn & Architecture, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
critical crack tip opening displacement (CTOD(c)); fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors; three-point bending (TPB) tests; wedge splitting (WS) tests; high strength; concrete; FRACTURE ENERGY; SENSOR; STRAIN; CRITERION;
D O I
10.1007/s11771-011-0890-4
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
Critical crack tip opening displacement (CTODc) of concrete using experimental and analytical evaluation with seven different compressive strengths ranging from 30 up to 150 MPa was studied based on two types of fracture tests: three-point bending (TPB) and wedge splitting (WS). In the tests, the values of CTODc were experimentally recorded using a novel technique, in which fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors were used, and two traditional techniques, in which strain gauges and clip gauges were deployed. The values of CTODc of tested concrete were also predicted using two existing analytical formulae proposed by JENQ & SHAH and XU, respectively. It is found that the values of CTODc obtained by both experimental measurements and analytical formulae exhibit a negligible variation as the compressive strength of concrete increases, and the test geometry adopted has little impact on the value of CTODc. Regarding the experimental measurement of CTODc, the clip gauge method generally leads to a larger value of CTODc and shows a more significant scatter as compared with the other two methods, while the strain gauge method leads to a slightly lower CTODc as compared with the FBG sensor method. The analytical formula proposed by JENQ and SHAH is found to generally lead to an overestimation, while the analytical formula proposed by XU shows a good accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:1693 / 1699
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Critical crack tip opening displacement of different strength concrete
    Bing Wang
    Xiu-fang Zhang
    Jian-guo Dai
    Shi-lang Xu
    [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2011, 18 : 1693 - 1699
  • [2] Critical crack tip opening displacement of different strength concrete
    王冰
    张秀芳
    戴建国
    徐世烺
    [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2011, 18 (05) : 1693 - 1699
  • [3] The critical crack tip opening displacement and critical crack extension of the strength mismatch weld joints
    Gubeljak, N
    Kozak, D
    Petrovski, B
    Rak, I
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE DESIGN 98, 1998, : 655 - 660
  • [4] Embedded crack tip opening displacement sensor for concrete
    Zhang, ZJ
    Ansari, F
    [J]. Sensing Issues in Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 2005, : 453 - 462
  • [5] THE STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRIC DETERMINATION OF THE CRITICAL CRACK TIP OPENING DISPLACEMENT
    KOLEDNIK, O
    STUWE, HP
    [J]. ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 1985, 21 (01) : 145 - &
  • [6] CRITICAL CRACK TIP OPENING DISPLACEMENT FOR POLYMER COMPOSITES
    VIPULANANDAN, C
    DHARMARAJAN, N
    [J]. ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 1989, 33 (03) : 409 - 419
  • [7] ON THE INFLUENCE OF SPECIMEN GEOMETRY ON THE CRITICAL CRACK-TIP-OPENING DISPLACEMENT
    KOLEDNIK, O
    KUTLESA, P
    [J]. ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 1989, 33 (02) : 215 - 223
  • [8] Fiber-optic crack-tip opening displacement sensor for concrete
    Lee, I
    Yuan, LB
    Ansari, F
    Hong, D
    [J]. CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES, 1997, 19 (01): : 59 - 68
  • [9] On the cyclic crack-tip opening displacement
    McEvily, A. J.
    [J]. FATIGUE & FRACTURE OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 2009, 32 (03) : 284 - 285
  • [10] Abnormality diagnosis of cracks in the concrete based on double crack tip opening displacement criterion
    ZhanChao Li
    ChongShi Gu
    ZhongRu Wu
    [J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2013, 56 : 1915 - 1928