Wideband myocardial perfusion pulse sequence for imaging patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device

被引:7
|
作者
Hong, KyungPyo [1 ]
Collins, Jeremy D. [1 ]
Knight, Bradley P. [2 ]
Carr, James C. [1 ]
Lee, Daniel C. [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Daniel [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Radiol, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Div Cardiol, Internal Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
artifact; cardiac device; CIED; myocardial perfusion; wideband; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; HEART-DISEASE; CONTRAST; SAFETY; PACEMAKER; FEASIBILITY; CARDIOLOGY; STATEMENT; PROTOCOL; MRI;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.27458
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop a wideband cardiac perfusion pulse sequence and test whether it is capable of suppressing image artifacts in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED), while not exceeding the specific absorption rate (SAR) limit (2.0 W/kg). Methods: A wideband perfusion pulse sequence was developed by incorporating a wideband saturation pulse to achieve a good balance between saturation of magnetization and SAR. Clinical standard and wideband perfusion MRI scans were performed back-to-back in a randomized order on 16 patients with a CIED undergoing clinical cardiac MRI. Two expert readers graded the artifact intensity and extent on a segmental basis using a 5-point Likert scale, where significant artifact was defined by a composite score. The variance in myocardial signal before tissue-enhancement was analyzed to quantify artifact-intensity. Whole-body SAR values computed by the MR scanner were read from the DICOM header. Either a paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare two groups. Results: While the mean whole-body SAR for a single-slice wideband perfusion scan (0.38 +/- 0.08 W/kg) was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than for a single-slice standard perfusion scan (0.11 +/- 0.03 W/kg), it was 81% below 2.0 W/kg. The mean variance in myocardial signal before tissue-enhancement was significantly (P < 0.001) higher for standard (422.6 +/- 306.6 au) than wideband (107.0 +/- 60.9 au). Among 105 myocardial segments, standard produced 19 segments (18%) that were deemed to have significant artifacts, whereas wideband produced only 3 segments (3%). Conclusion: A wideband perfusion pulse sequence is capable of suppressing image artifacts induced by a CIED while not exceeding SAR at 2.0 W/kg.
引用
收藏
页码:1219 / 1228
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accelerated Wideband Myocardial Perfusion Pulse Sequence with Compressed Sensing Reconstruction for Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification in Patients with a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device
    Hong, KyungPyo
    Collins, Jeremy D.
    Freed, Benjamin H.
    Fan, Lexiaozi
    Arai, Andrew E.
    Hsu, Li-Yueh
    Lee, Daniel C.
    Kim, Daniel
    [J]. RADIOLOGY-CARDIOTHORACIC IMAGING, 2020, 2 (02):
  • [2] Wideband radiofrequency pulse sequence for evaluation of myocardial scar in patients with cardiac implantable devices
    Shah, Neil D.
    Krishnam, Mayil
    Venkatesh, Bharat Ambale
    Khan, Fouzia
    Smith, Michele
    Jones, Darwin R.
    Koon, Patrick
    Mao, Xianglun
    Janich, Martin A.
    Brau, Anja C. S.
    Salerno, Michael
    Dash, Rajesh
    Chan, Frandics
    Yang, Phillip C.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 4
  • [3] Evaluation of the Performance and Safety of Wideband Cardiac MRI in Patients With a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED)
    Schwartz, Sarah M.
    Pathrose, Ashitha
    Serhal, Ali
    Avery, Ryan
    Ragin, Ann
    Charron, Jessica
    Knight, Bradley P.
    Passman, Rod S.
    Kim, Daniel
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2020, 142
  • [4] Considerations for stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Chyou, Janice Y.
    Axel, Leon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (10) : 2136 - 2138
  • [5] Radiotherapy in Patients With a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device
    Sharifzadehgan, Ardalan
    Laurans, Marc
    Thuillot, Marine
    Huertas, Andres
    Baudinaud, Pierre
    Narayanan, Kumar
    Mirabel, Mariana
    Bibault, Jean-Emmanuel
    Frey, Pierre
    Waldmann, Victor
    Varlet, Emilie
    Amet, Denis
    Juin, Christophe
    Lavergne, Thomas
    Jouven, Xavier
    Giraud, Philippe
    Durdux, Catherine
    Marijon, Eloi
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 128 : 196 - 201
  • [6] Clinical and imaging diagnosis of cardiac implantable electronic device infections
    Hernandez-Meneses, Marta
    Perissinotti, Andres
    Vidal, Barbara
    Tolosana, Jose Maria
    Miro, Jose Maria
    [J]. CIRUGIA CARDIOVASCULAR, 2023, 30 (04): : 220 - 225
  • [7] Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients at Risk
    Tarakji, Khaldoun G.
    Ellis, Christopher R.
    Defaye, Pascal
    Kennergren, Charles
    [J]. ARRHYTHMIA & ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY REVIEW, 2016, 5 (01) : 65 - 71
  • [8] Wideband black-blood late gadolinium enhancement imaging for improved myocardial scar assessment in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Gut, Pauline
    Cochet, Hubert
    Caluori, Guido
    El-Hamrani, Dounia
    Constantin, Marion
    Vlachos, Konstantinos
    Sridi, Soumaya
    Antiochos, Panagiotis
    Schwitter, Juerg
    Masi, Ambra
    Sacher, Frederic
    Jais, Pierre
    Stuber, Matthias
    Bustin, Aurelien
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2024, 92 (05) : 1851 - 1866
  • [9] A MULTIMODALITY IMAGING APPROACH TO DIAGNOSING CARDIAC IMPLANTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE INFECTION
    Halboni, Adnan
    Dawdy, John
    Mishra, Tushar
    Kottam, Anupama
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 79 (09) : 3060 - 3060
  • [10] Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Safety during Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Hwang, You Mi
    Kim, Jun
    Lee, Ji Hyun
    Kim, Minsu
    Nam, Gi-Byoung
    Choi, Kee-Joon
    Kim, You-Ho
    [J]. KOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2016, 46 (06) : 804 - 810