Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined Multimodality Somatosensory Evoked Potential and Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Intraoperative Monitoring in Patients With Idiopathic Scoliosis

被引:48
|
作者
Thirumala, Parthasarathy D. [1 ,3 ]
Huang, Jessie [1 ]
Thiagarajan, Karthy [1 ]
Cheng, Hannah [1 ]
Balzer, Jeffrey [1 ,2 ]
Crammond, Donald J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Neurol Surg, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Neurosci, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
evoked potential monitoring; fusion; intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring; motor evoked potential; multimodality; scoliosis; somatosensory evoked potential; spinal cord; spinal deformity; spine; SPINAL-DEFORMITY; RESEARCH-SOCIETY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000001678
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Systematic review. Objective. The aim of the study was to determine the predictive value of combined multimodality somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) and transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring in detecting impending neurological injury during surgery for idiopathic scoliosis. Summary of Background Data. The diagnostic of motor evoked potential monitoring and SSEP monitoring have been established. However, the predictive value of combined multimodality SSEP and TcMEP monitoring in detecting impending neurological injury during surgery for idiopathic scoliosis has not been evaluated. Methods. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and EMBASE from 1974 to January 2015. All titles and abstracts were independently reviewed by the authors. We included all studies that were (1) randomized controlled trials, prospective or retrospective cohort studies; (2) included patients with idiopathic scoliosis undergoing scoliosis correction surgery; (3) included multimodality SSEP and TcMEP monitoring during spinal surgery; (4) included immediate postoperative neurological assessment; (5) idiopathic scoliosis patient population n >= 25; and (6) published in English. Results. Seven studies comprising a total of 2052 patients with idiopathic scoliosis were included in our meta-analysis. The incidence of neurological deficit in this cohort was 0.93%. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and Diagnostic Odds Ratio were 82.6% (95% CI 56.7%-94.5%), 94.4% (95% CI 85.1%-98.0%), and 106.16 (95% CI 24.952-451.667), respectively. The area under the curve was 0.928, indicating excellent discriminatory ability. Conclusion. Idiopathic scoliosis corrective surgery patients who experience a new neurological deficit are 106.16 times more likely to have had an SSEP and/or TcMEP change during corrective procedures. The results of this meta-analysis demonstrate that combined multimodality SSEP and TcMEP monitoring possess some advantage over use of each alone, and that intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring may provide a valuable biomarker in detection of impending neurological injury.
引用
收藏
页码:E1177 / E1184
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during scoliosis fusion
    Thirumala, Parthasarathy D.
    Cheng, Hannah L.
    Loke, Yoon K.
    Hamilton, D. Kojo
    Balzer, Jeffrey
    Crammond, Donald J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 30 : 8 - 14
  • [2] INTRAOPERATIVE SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED-POTENTIAL MONITORING IN SCOLIOSIS
    ROY, EP
    GUTMANN, L
    RIGGS, JE
    JONES, ET
    BYRD, JA
    RINGEL, RA
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1988, (229) : 94 - 98
  • [3] Poor diagnostic accuracy of transcranial motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during brainstem cavernoma resection
    Shiban, Ehab
    Zerr, Marina
    Huber, Thomas
    Boeck-Behrends, Tobias
    Wostrack, Maria
    Ringel, Florian
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Lehmberg, Jens
    [J]. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2015, 157 (11) : 1963 - 1969
  • [4] Poor diagnostic accuracy of transcranial motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during brainstem cavernoma resection
    Ehab Shiban
    Marina Zerr
    Thomas Huber
    Tobias Boeck-Behrends
    Maria Wostrack
    Florian Ringel
    Bernhard Meyer
    Jens Lehmberg
    [J]. Acta Neurochirurgica, 2015, 157 : 1963 - 1969
  • [5] Intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in scoliosis surgery
    Nemec, M.
    Bednarik, J.
    Krbec, M.
    Mokra, M.
    [J]. CESKA A SLOVENSKA NEUROLOGIE A NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2006, 69 (01) : 45 - 51
  • [6] Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring
    Fujiki, Minoru
    [J]. NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2008, 36 (03): : 199 - 204
  • [7] Outcomes of Combined Somatosensory Evoked Potential, Motor Evoked Potential, and Electroencephalography Monitoring during Carotid Endarterectomy
    Alcantara, Sean D.
    Wuamett, Joseph C.
    Lantis, John C., II
    Ulkatan, Sedat
    Bamberger, Philip
    Mendes, Donna
    Benvenisty, Alan
    Todd, George
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 28 (03) : 665 - 672
  • [8] Safety of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring
    MacDonald, DB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 19 (05) : 416 - 429
  • [9] Somatosensory and transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring in a porcine model for experimental procedures
    Maier, Sven
    Goebel, Ulrich
    Krause, Sonja
    Benk, Christoph
    Schick, Martin A.
    Buerkle, Hartmut
    Beyersdorf, Friedhelm
    Kari, Fabian A.
    Wollborn, Jakob
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (10):
  • [10] Re: Outcomes of Combined Somatosensory Evoked Potential, Motor Evoked Potential, and Electroencephalography Monitoring during Carotid Endarterectomy
    Malcharek, Michael J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 28 (05) : 1351 - 1351