Shortcomings of political instruments for agricultural soil conservation

被引:0
|
作者
Hagemann, Nina [1 ]
Prager, Katrin [2 ]
机构
[1] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Helmholtz Zentrum Umweltforsch, Dept Okon, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[2] James Hutton Inst, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, Scotland
来源
BERICHTE UBER LANDWIRTSCHAFT | 2011年 / 89卷 / 02期
关键词
EROSION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Soil degradation results in long-term damage of soil structures which causes income loss for farmers and has negative ecological and social impacts. The article is based on a case study carried out in the Uckermark region (Brandenburg) that has been conducted as part of the EU research project "Sustainable Agriculture and Soil Conservation" (SoCo). SoCo is aimed at analysing the design and implementation of current political instruments in different EU Member States. In the case study area Uckermark, empirical data have been collected through face-to-face, semi-structured interviews exploring the design, implementation and monitoring of policies for agricultural soil conservation. Both document analysis and interviews indicate that there are deficits in practical soil conservation despite the fact that a range of policies for soil conservation exist. Due to the complex nature of soil degradation it is not possible to link soil conservation effects to individual policies. We therefore base our arguments on the analysis of the requirements of existing instruments and their assessment by local and regional actors. The study shows that the current soil conservation policies only partially address soil degradation issues. This is mainly due to a lack of capacities in the responsible administrations, insufficient design and implementation of the legal requirements, and - in the Uckermark - a lack of regionally adapted incentive schemes. At the same time, the paper provides options for a more effective implementation of soil conservation measures.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 350
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EMPLOYMENT OF MOST SUITABLE INSTRUMENTS FOR CONSERVATION OF AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS
    SCHARF, E
    [J]. AGRARTECHNIK, 1981, 31 (12): : 539 - 541
  • [2] POLITICAL SUPPORT FOR SOIL CONSERVATION
    HADWIGER, DF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 1982, 37 (05): : 275 - 275
  • [3] Agricultural lime for soil conservation and fertility
    不详
    [J]. ZKG INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 66 (09): : 26 - 26
  • [4] AGRICULTURAL POLICY AND SOIL CONSERVATION - COMMENT
    LOWITT, R
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL HISTORY, 1985, 59 (02) : 320 - 325
  • [5] FERTILIZERS IN AN AGRICULTURAL SOIL CONSERVATION SYSTEM
    BARAYEV, AI
    VOLKOV, YD
    [J]. SOVIET SOIL SCIENCE, 1973, 5 (01): : 14 - 21
  • [6] SOIL CONSERVATION ON AGRICULTURAL LAND - CHALLENGE AHEAD
    DAVIS, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 1977, 32 (01): : 5 - 8
  • [7] Soil and Water Conservation in Agricultural and Forestry Systems
    Lopez-Vicente, Manuel
    Wu, Gao-Lin
    [J]. WATER, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [8] Agricultural Mechanization do damage or soil conservation?
    Alvarado Chaves, Armando
    [J]. TECNOLOGIA EN MARCHA, 2006, 19 (01): : 56 - 60
  • [9] SPATIAL ORGANISATION OF AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE AND SOIL CONSERVATION
    Hrnciarova, Tatiana
    [J]. ACTA SCIENTIARUM POLONORUM-FORMATIO CIRCUMIECTUS, 2007, 6 (03) : 9 - 17
  • [10] Improving soil conservation in agricultural machinery use - Recommendations for agricultural practice
    Brandhuber, Robert
    Demmel, Markus
    Koch, Heinz-Josef
    Brunotte, Joachim
    [J]. ZUCKERINDUSTRIE, 2009, 134 (04): : 255 - 259