They (Don't) Need Us: Functional Indispensability Impacts Perceptions of Representativeness and Commitment When Lower-Status Groups Go Through an Intergroup Merger

被引:5
|
作者
Rosa, Miriam [1 ,2 ]
Giessner, Steffen [2 ]
Guerra, Rita [1 ]
Waldzus, Sven [1 ]
Kersting, Anna-Maria [3 ]
Velickovic, Katarina [4 ]
Collins, Elizabeth C. [1 ]
机构
[1] CIS IUL, Inst Univ Lisboa ISCTE IUL, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Salzburg, Dept Psychol, Salzburg, Austria
[4] Lund Univ, Dept Psychol, Lund, Sweden
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2020年 / 10卷
关键词
intergroup relations; intergroup change; mergers; lower-status groups; prototypicality; functional indispensability; information processing; ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION; POSTMERGER IDENTIFICATION; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; IDENTITY MANAGEMENT; NATIONAL IDENTITY; MOTIVATION GAINS; PREMERGER STATUS; INGROUP; PROTOTYPICALITY; ACQUISITIONS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02772
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Intergroup changes occur often between subgroups who are asymmetric in status (e.g., size, power, prestige), with important consequences for social identification, especially among the members of lower-status groups. Mergers offer an example of such changes, when subgroups (merger partners) merge into a common, superordinate group (post-merger group). Lower-status subgroups frequently perceive they are less represented in the post-merger group, therefore committing less to the changes a merger implies. Five studies offered an intergroup relations' perspective on mergers (N's = 479, 150, 266, 113, and 229, respectively), examining how functional indispensability (instrumental contribution of the ingroup) positively influences perceptions of representativeness in the post-merger group (relative ingroup prototypicality), which, in turn, affect post-merger identification and, finally, change commitment. Additionally, the role of cognitive information processing (heuristic vs. systematic) on prototypicality was explored. Results suggest that functional indispensability impacts relative ingroup prototypicality (Studies 1-5), and this may be moderated by information processing (Study 2). Moreover, prototypicality and identification with the superordinate post-merged group mediated the effect of functional indispensability on change commitment (Studies 1-3). These findings provide important theoretical insights into prototypicality perceptions held by lower-status merger partners and minority groups in general, by identifying functional indispensability as a source of prototypicality other than relative status. In addition, by proposing a functional approach to the relations between social groups, these findings suggest better practices for managing structural changes, such as combining sources of strategic/functional and identity fit when announcing an intergroup change.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据