Evaluation of the International Association of the Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group New Criteria: Gestational Diabetes Project

被引:32
|
作者
Kong, Jason M. [1 ]
Lim, Ken [2 ]
Thompson, David M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Div Endocrinol, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
关键词
gestational diabetes; new diagnostic criteria; MELLITUS; OUTCOMES; COHORT; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.09.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the diagnostic rates of gestational diabetes (GDM) and maternal/fetal outcomes before and after replacement of the Carpenter and Coustan (C&C) criteria with the International Association Diabetes Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) criteria. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all pregnancies in 2 separate 6-month cohorts in the province of British Columbia. The first C&C cohort was defined as a 6-month period prior to the introduction of the IADPSG 75 g glucose tolerance test on October 1, 2010. The IADPSG cohort was studied during a 6-month period after the change. Results: There was a significant increase in rates of GDM when using the IADPSG 75 g criteria, from 7.9% (1838 of 23 211) to 9.4% (2104 of 22 397). There were no significant changes in maternal outcomes when using the IADPSG criteria (caesarean section, induction of labour, perineal laceration, pregnancy-induced hypertension, antepartum hemorrhage >20 weeks or postpartum hospital length of stay). The caesarean section rate was not increased according to multivariate analysis (30.9% vs. 29.7%; p = 0.073). There were no significant changes in most fetal outcomes when using the IADPSG criteria (mean gestational age at birth, premature birth, meconium, birth trauma, mean birth weight, large for gestational age, small for gestational age, intrauterine growth restriction), but neonatal hypoglycemia was significantly higher (1.6% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.007). Conclusions: The rates of GDM were higher when using the new IADPSG criteria. Overall, all of the maternal and most of the fetal outcomes were similar. (C) 2015 Canadian Diabetes Association
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 132
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group Criteria with the Old American Diabetes Association Criteria for Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
    Niroomand, Mahtab
    Afsar, Jamileh
    Hosseinpanah, Farhad
    Afrakhteh, Maryam
    Farzaneh, Farah
    Serahati, Sara
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2019, 17 (04)
  • [2] The impact of adoption of the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group criteria for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes
    Mayo, Karli
    Melamed, Nir
    Vandenberghe, Hilde
    Berger, Howard
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (02) : 224.e1 - 224.e9
  • [3] Impact of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria for gestational diabetes
    Trujillo, Janet
    Vigo, Alvaro
    Duncan, Bruce B.
    Falavigna, Maicon
    Wendland, Eliana M.
    Campos, Maria A.
    Schmidt, Maria I.
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2015, 108 (02) : 288 - 295
  • [4] The implications of the new International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes
    Holt, R. I. G.
    Coleman, M. A.
    McCance, D. R.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2011, 28 (04) : 382 - 385
  • [5] Investigation on the suitability of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus in China
    Shang, M.
    Lin, L.
    Ma, L.
    Yin, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 34 (02) : 141 - 145
  • [6] Neonatal birth weight in women with gestational diabetes defined by International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) criteria
    Resi, V.
    Lacaria, E.
    Ghio, A.
    Nosiglia, G.
    Battini, L.
    Carmignani, A.
    Bottone, P.
    Volpe, L.
    Del Prato, S.
    Bertolotto, A.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2012, 55 : S440 - S440
  • [7] Diagnosis of more gestational diabetes lead to better pregnancy outcomes: Comparing the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group criteria, and the Carpenter and Coustan criteria
    Wu, En-Tzu
    Nien, Feng-Jung
    Kuo, Chun-Heng
    Chen, Szu-Chi
    Chen, Kuan-Yu
    Chuang, Lee-Ming
    Li, Hung-Yuan
    Lee, Chien-Nan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2016, 7 (01) : 121 - 126
  • [8] Gestational diabetes in Saudi women identified by the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group versus the former American Diabetes Association criteria: a prospective cohort study
    Alfadhli, Eman
    [J]. ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 2015, 35 (06) : 428 - 434
  • [9] Incidence and Outcomes of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using the New International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group Criteria in Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
    Pouliot, Alexandra
    Elmahboubi, Riham
    Adam, Catherine
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2019, 43 (08) : 594 - 599
  • [10] Pregnancy Outcomes of Women Additionally Diagnosed as Gestational Diabetes by the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria
    Kim, Min Hyoung
    Kwak, Soo Heon
    Kim, Sung-Hoon
    Hong, Joon Seok
    Chung, Hye Rim
    Choi, Sung Hee
    Kim, Moon Young
    Jang, Hak C.
    [J]. DIABETES & METABOLISM JOURNAL, 2019, 43 (06) : 766 - 775