Comparative Evaluation of 4-Dimensional Computed Tomography and 4-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Delineate the Target of Primary Liver Cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Chen, Yukai [1 ]
Gong, Guanzhong [2 ]
Wang, Yinxing [2 ]
Liu, Chenlu [3 ]
Su, Ya [2 ]
Wang, Lizhen [2 ]
Yang, Bo [1 ]
Yin, Yong [2 ]
机构
[1] East China Univ Technol, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong First Med Univ & Shandong Acad Med Sci, Shandong Canc Hosp & Inst, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ South China, Sch Nucl Sci & Technol, Hengyang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
4DCT; MRI; respiratory motion simulation; liver cancer; tumor delineation; radiotherapy; MOTION; RADIOTHERAPY; LUNG; MRI; ARTIFACTS; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; THERAPY; TUMORS; 4DCT;
D O I
10.1177/15330338211045499
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4DMRI) in establishing the target of primary liver cancer in comparison with 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT). Methods and Materials: A total of 23 patients with primary liver cancer who received radiotherapy were selected, and 4DCT and T2w-4DMRI simulations were conducted to obtain 4DCT and T2w-4DMRI simulation images. The 4DCT and T2w-4DMRI data were sorted into 10 and 8 respiratory phase bins, respectively. The liver and gross tumor volumes (GTVs) were delineated in all images using programmed clinical workflows under tumor delineation guidelines. The internal organs at risk volumes (IRVs) and internal target volumes (ITVs) were the unions of all the phase livers and GTVs, respectively. Then, the artifacts, liver volume, GTV, and motion range in 4DCT and T2w-4DMRI were compared. Results: The mean GTV volume based on 4DMRI was 136.42 +/- 231.27 cm(3), which was 25.04 cm(3) (15.5%) less than that of 4DCT (161.46 +/- 280.29 cm(3)). The average volume of ITV determined by 4DMRI was 166.12 +/- 270.43 cm(3), which was 22.44 cm(3) (11.9%) less than that determined by 4DCT (188.56 +/- 307.57 cm(3)). Liver volume and IRV in 4DMRI increased by 4.0% and 6.6%, respectively, compared with 4DCT. The difference in tumor motion by T2w-4DMRI based on the centroid was greater than that of 4DCT in the L/R, A/P, and S/I directions, and the average displacement differences were 2.6, 2.8, and 6.9 mm, respectively. The severe artifacts in 4DCT were 47.8% (11/23) greater than in 4DMRI 17.4% (4/23). Conclusions: Compared with 4DCT, T2-weighted and navigator-triggered 4DMRI produces fewer artifacts and larger motion differences in hepatic intrafraction tumors, which is a feasible technique for primary liver cancer treatment planning.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 4-dimensional computed tomography imaging and treatment planning
    Keall, P
    [J]. SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2004, 14 (01) : 81 - 90
  • [2] Comparative Assessment of Liver Tumor Motion Using Cine-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus 4-Dimensional Computed Tomography
    Fernandes, Annemarie T.
    Apisarnthanarax, Smith
    Yin, Lingshu
    Zou, Wei
    Rosen, Mark
    Plastaras, John P.
    Ben-Josef, Edgar
    Metz, James M.
    Teo, Boon-Keng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 91 (05): : 1034 - 1040
  • [3] Assessment of Correlation between Diaphragm and Target Motion in 4-Dimensional Computed Tomography for Liver Cancer
    Kim, H.
    Kim, H.
    Lee, S.
    Yoon, S.
    Jung, J.
    Kwak, J.
    Jeong, C.
    Yoon, K.
    Park, M.
    Cho, M.
    Cho, B.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E146 - E146
  • [4] 4-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Levoatriocardinal Vein
    Gabbour, Maya
    Markl, Michael
    Robinson, Joshua D.
    Rigsby, Cynthia K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (14) : 1291 - 1291
  • [5] Evaluation of 4-dimensional Computed Tomography to 4-dimensional Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Deformable Image Registration for Lung Cancer Adaptive Radiation Therapy
    Balik, Salim
    Weiss, Elisabeth
    Jan, Nuzhat
    Roman, Nicholas
    Sleeman, William C.
    Fatyga, Mirek
    Christensen, Gary E.
    Zhang, Cheng
    Murphy, Martin J.
    Lu, Jun
    Keall, Paul
    Williamson, Jeffrey F.
    Hugo, Geoffrey D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 86 (02): : 372 - 379
  • [6] Accuracy of 4-Dimensional Computed Tomography for Localization in Primary Hyperparathyroidism
    Eller, Michael
    Dave, Atman
    Johnson, Craig
    Fingeret, Abbey L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 257 : 15 - 21
  • [7] Respiratory Amplitude Guided 4-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Hu, Yanle
    Caruthers, Shelton D.
    Low, Daniel A.
    Parikh, Parag J.
    Mutic, Sasa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 86 (01): : 198 - 204
  • [8] Imaging features of cardioembolic stroke on 4-dimensional computed tomography angiography
    Wu, Jiajing
    Liu, Jiayang
    Wang, Jingjie
    Li, Jing
    Gu, Sirun
    Yao, Yunzhuo
    Xiong, Hua
    Li, Yongmei
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2023, 13 (09) : 6026 - 6036
  • [9] Dynamic Evaluation of Pisotriquetral Instability Using 4-dimensional Computed Tomography
    Demehri, Shadpour
    Wadhwa, Vibhor
    Thawait, Gaurav K.
    Fattahi, Nikoo
    Means, Kenneth R.
    Carrino, John A.
    Chhabra, Avneesh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2014, 38 (04) : 507 - 512
  • [10] 4-DIMENSIONAL BEAM TOMOGRAPHY
    MINERBO, GN
    SANDER, OR
    JAMESON, RA
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1981, 28 (03) : 2231 - 2233