Evaluating Different Non-Destructive Estimation Methods for Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Nitrogen Status Based on Canopy Spectrum

被引:14
|
作者
Li, Hongjun [1 ]
Zhang, Yuming [1 ]
Lei, Yuping [1 ]
Antoniuk, Vita [2 ]
Hu, Chunsheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Agr Water Resources, Innovat Acad Seed Design, Ctr Agr Resources Res,Inst Genet & Dev Biol, 286 Huaizhong Rd, Shijiazhuang 050021, Peoples R China
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Agroecol, Blichers Alle 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
canopy spectrum; non-destructive nitrogen status diagnosis; drone; multispectral camera; SPAD; smartphone photography; LEAF-AREA INDEX; VEGETATION INDEX; DIGITAL CAMERA; SEGMENTATION; YIELD;
D O I
10.3390/rs12010095
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Compared to conventional laboratory testing methods, crop nitrogen estimation methods based on canopy spectral characteristics have advantages in terms of timeliness, cost, and practicality. A variety of rapid and non-destructive estimation methods based on the canopy spectrum have been developed on the scale of space, sky, and ground. In order to understand the differences in estimation accuracy and applicability of these methods, as well as for the convenience of users to select the suitable technology, models for estimation of nitrogen status of winter wheat were developed and compared for three methods: drone equipped with a multispectral camera, soil plant analysis development (SPAD) chlorophyll meter, and smartphone photography. Based on the correlations between observed nitrogen status in winter wheat and related vegetation indices, green normalized difference vegetation index (GNDVI) and visible atmospherically resistant index (VARI) were selected as the sensitive vegetation indices for the drone equipped with a multispectral camera and smartphone photography methods, respectively. The correlation coefficients between GNDVI, SPAD, and VARI were 0.92 ** and 0.89 **, and that between SPAD and VARI was 0.90 **, which indicated that three vegetation indices for these three estimation methods were significantly related to each other. The determination coefficients of the 0-90 cm soil nitrate nitrogen content estimation models for the drone equipped with a multispectral camera, SPAD, and smartphone photography methods were 0.63, 0.54, and 0.81, respectively. In the estimation accuracy evaluation, the method of smartphone photography had the smallest root mean square error (RMSE = 9.80 mg/kg). The accuracy of the smartphone photography method was slightly higher than the other two methods. Due to the limitations of these models, it was found that the crop nitrogen estimation methods based on canopy spectrum were not suitable for the crops under severe phosphate deficiency. In addition, in estimation of soil nitrate nitrogen content, there were saturation responses in the estimation indicators of the three methods. In order to introduce these three methods in the precise management of nitrogen fertilizer, it is necessary to further improve their estimation models.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) nitrogen status using canopy spectrum reflectance and multiple statistical analysis
    Feng, Mei-chen
    Zhao, Jia-Jia
    Yang, Wu-De
    Wang, Chao
    Zhang, Mei-Jun
    Xiao, Lu-Jie
    Ding, Guang-Wei
    [J]. SPECTROSCOPY LETTERS, 2016, 49 (08) : 507 - 513
  • [2] Early detection of canopy nitrogen deficiency in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) based on hyperspectral measurement of canopy chlorophyll status
    Zhao, C.
    Wang, Z.
    Wang, J.
    Huang, W.
    Guo, T.
    [J]. NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2011, 39 (04) : 251 - 262
  • [3] Remote Sensing of Leaf and Canopy Nitrogen Status in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Based on N-PROSAIL Model
    Li, Zhenhai
    Jin, Xiuliang
    Yang, Guijun
    Drummond, Jane
    Yang, Hao
    Clark, Beth
    Li, Zhenhong
    Zhao, Chunjiang
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (09)
  • [4] Assessment of plant water status in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) based on canopy spectral indices
    Sun, Hui
    Feng, Meichen
    Xiao, Lujie
    Yang, Wude
    Wang, Chao
    Jia, Xueqin
    Zhao, Yu
    Zhao, Chunqi
    Muhammad, Saleem Kubar
    Li, Deying
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (06):
  • [5] Development of SPAD value-based linear models for non-destructive estimation of photosynthetic pigments in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
    Kumar, Pramod
    Sharma, R. K.
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND PLANT BREEDING, 2019, 79 (01) : 96 - 99
  • [6] A note on a non-destructive method of chlorophyll determination in wheat (Triticum aestivum L)
    Finnan, JM
    Burke, JI
    Jones, MB
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD RESEARCH, 1997, 36 (01) : 85 - 89
  • [7] EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT TOP-DRESSING METHODS AND NITROGEN LEVEL ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF WINTER WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)
    He, Yakai
    Zhao, Xueguan
    Dou, Hanjie
    Gao, Yuanyuan
    Wang, Xiu
    Li, Cuiling
    Li, Jiqiao
    [J]. BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2020, 49 (03): : 769 - 776
  • [8] Genotypic Differences for Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
    Marijana Baric
    Hrvoje Sarcevic
    Snjezana Keresa
    Ivanka Habus Jercic
    Ivana Rukavina
    [J]. Cereal Research Communications, 2007, 35 : 213 - 216
  • [9] Genotypic differences for nitrogen use efficiency in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
    Baric, Marijana
    Sarcevic, Hrvoje
    Keresa, Snjezana
    Jercic, Ivanka Habus
    Rukavina, Ivana
    [J]. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2007, 35 (02) : 213 - 216
  • [10] Nitrogen Uptake by Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Depending on Fertilizer Application
    Sedlar, O.
    Balik, J.
    Cerny, J.
    Peklova, L.
    Kulhanek, M.
    [J]. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 43 (03) : 515 - 524