Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Aspiration Thrombectomy Vs. Conventional Percutaneous Coronary Intervention During ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

被引:10
|
作者
Dominguez, Abel Casso [1 ]
Bittl, John A. [2 ]
El-Hayek, Georges [1 ]
Contreras, Elizabeth [3 ]
Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai St Lukes Roosevelt Hosp, New York, NY 10025 USA
[2] Munroe Reg Med Ctr, Ocala Heart Inst, Ocala, FL USA
[3] Inst Tecnol Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo, Dominican Rep
关键词
aspiration thrombectomy; STEMI; percutaneous coronary intervention; THROMBUS ASPIRATION; NO-REFLOW; ADJUNCTIVE THROMBECTOMY; PRIMARY ANGIOPLASTY; EXPORT CATHETER; ABCIXIMAB; IMPACT; ARTERY;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.26352
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Evaluate the impact of aspiration thrombectomy (AT) during primary coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) on clinical outcomes. Background: AT during PCI for STEMI may improve microvascular reperfusion, but its impact on clinical outcomes has remained controversial. Methods: We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, Medline, Scopus, CENTRAL, andClinicalTrials.gov databases on March 31, 2015 for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the use of AT with PCI compared with PCI alone for STEMI. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Secondary end points included major adverse cardiac events (MACE, consisting of death, myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization), recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), target-vessel revascularization (TVR), stent thrombosis and stroke. Results: Eighteen randomized controlled trials (n=21,501) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A total of 10,544 patients were treated with AT and PCI, compared to 10,957 control patients. The use of AT was not associated with a significant decrease in all-cause mortality (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.78-1.01; P=0.07), MACE (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.86-1.00; P=0.06), recurrent MI (RR 0.97: 95% CI 0.81-1.17; P=0.77), TVR (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.82-1.05; P=0.23), stent thrombosis (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.66-1.07; P=0.17), or stroke (RR 1.35; 95% CI 0.86-2.11; P=0.19). Conclusions: Using the totality of evidence available through 2015, this meta-analysis failed to show that the routine use of aspiration thrombectomy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction significantly reduces all-cause mortality, MACE, recurrent MI, TVR, or stent thrombosis. The role of aspiration thrombectomy in selected patients with angiographic evidence of large thrombus burden requires further clinical investigation. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1203 / 1210
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aspiration thrombectomy in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Meta-analysis of 16 randomized trials
    Tanboga, I. H.
    Topcu, S.
    Aksakal, E.
    Kurt, M.
    Kaya, A.
    Sevimli, S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 : 1040 - 1040
  • [2] Meta-analysis of randomized trials on access site selection for percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Komocsi, Andras
    Aradi, Daniel
    Kehl, Daniel
    Ungi, Imre
    Thury, Attila
    Pinter, Tuende
    Di Nicolantonio, James J.
    Tornyos, Adrienn
    Vorobcsuk, Andras
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 10 (02) : 203 - 212
  • [3] The efficacy and safety of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention VS transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: A meta-analysis
    Pang, Jun
    Zhang, Zheng
    Yang, Yue-jin
    Li, Na
    Bai, Min
    Peng, Yu
    Zhang, Jin
    Li, Qiang
    Zhang, Bo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 177 (02) : 483 - 488
  • [4] Percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Kimura K.
    Kosuge M.
    Okuda J.
    [J]. Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics, 2010, 25 (2) : 53 - 59
  • [5] Additional manual thrombus aspiration for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction during percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated meta-analysis
    Zhang, Yan
    Peng, Li
    Fan, Yong-Yan
    Lu, Cai-Yi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (04) : 344 - 354
  • [6] Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials on Remote Ischemic Conditioning During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Elbadawi, Ayman
    Ha, Le Dung
    Abuzaid, Ahmed S.
    Crimi, Gabriele
    Azzouz, Muhammad S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 119 (06): : 832 - 838
  • [7] Percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Gao, Lei
    Hu, Xin
    Liu, Yu-Qi
    Xue, Qiao
    Feng, Quan-Zhou
    [J]. CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2014, 9 : 1241 - 1246
  • [8] Advances in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Aragon, Joseph R.
    Shenoda, Michael M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 23 : 19 - 23
  • [9] Transradial vs Transfemoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
    Singh, Sukhchain
    Singh, Mukesh
    Grewal, Navsheen
    Khosla, Sandeep
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 32 (06) : 777 - 790
  • [10] A Meta-Analysis Of Facilitated And Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention For Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Amer, Muhammad
    Nawaz, Yasir
    Adomaityte, Jurga
    Siddiqui, Zishan Khalid
    Qayyum, Rehan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 102 (8A): : 60I - 60I