The Initial Upper Paleolithic in Central and East Asia: Blade Technology, Cultural Transmission, and Implications for Human Dispersals

被引:38
|
作者
Zwyns, Nicolas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Anthropol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Max Planck Inst Evolutionary Anthropol, Dept Human Evolut, Leipzig, Germany
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Initial Upper Paleolithic; Asia; Cultural transmission; Lithic studies; Human dispersals; LATE PLEISTOCENE; POPULATION-SIZE; EVOLUTION; COMPLEXITY; DEMOGRAPHY; SPREAD; EUROPE; AURIGNACIAN; FRAMEWORK; EMERGENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s41982-021-00085-6
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
Archaeological assemblages labeled as Initial Upper Paleolithic are often seen as possible evidence for dispersals of Homo sapiens populations in Eurasia, ca. 45,000 years ago. While most authors agree that the IUP can be recognized by a set of shared features, there is far less consensus on what these features are, and what they mean. Because of methodological challenges inherent to long distance comparisons, documenting and establishing a firm connection between archaeological assemblages remain difficult and often draw legitimate skepticism. There could be many reasons why Paleolithic hunter-gatherers used comparable technologies, but it usually comes down to two kinds of processes: cultural transmission or convergence. In other words, technological similarities may illustrate a cultural link between regions or may be caused by mechanisms of independent reinvention between more distantly related populations. Here, I focus on three assemblages from the Siberian Altai, Zabaikal region, and North Mongolia to address one main question: is there such thing as a united IUP in Central and East Asia, or are we looking at unrelated yet comparable adaptive processes? First, I describe the common structure of lithic blade production at the sites, with special attention to derived features relative to the regional sequence. After comparing the complexity of the production system with those of other lithic technologies, I suggest that this coherent, intricate, yet unprecedented technological pattern found across contiguous regions in Asia is better explained by transmission processes than by multiple unrelated reinventions, or local developments. The blade production system described in Siberia and Mongolia reoccur as a package, which is consistent with indirect bias and/or conformist cultural transmission processes. Overall, the results point toward close contact between individuals and hunter gatherer populations, and supports the recognition of a broad cultural unit to encapsulate Asian IUP assemblages. Considering other lines of evidence, the geographical and chronological distribution of Asian IUP lithic technology is consistent with a dispersal of Homo sapiens populations in Central and East Asia during the Marine Isotopic Stage 3, although the geographical origin of such movement is less clear.
引用
收藏
页数:39
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] The Initial Upper Paleolithic in Central and East Asia: Blade Technology, Cultural Transmission, and Implications for Human Dispersals
    Nicolas Zwyns
    [J]. Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology, 4
  • [2] REDATING SHUIDONGGOU LOCALITY 1 AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE INITIAL UPPER PALEOLITHIC IN EAST ASIA
    Morgan, Christopher
    Barton, Loukas
    Yi, Mingjie
    Bettinger, Robert L.
    Gao, Xing
    Peng, Fei
    [J]. RADIOCARBON, 2014, 56 (01) : 165 - 179
  • [3] Middle and Upper Paleolithic Levallois technology in eastern Central Asia
    Rybin, Evgeny P.
    Khatsenovich, Arina M.
    [J]. QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 535 : 117 - 138
  • [4] Tools, beads, and migrations: Specific cultural traits in the Initial Upper Paleolithic of Southern Siberia and Central Asia
    Rybin, Evgeny P.
    [J]. QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 347 : 39 - 52
  • [5] The Paleolithic of the Iranian Plateau: Hominin occupation history and implications for human dispersals across southern Asia
    Shoaee, Mohammad Javad
    Nasab, Hamed Vahdati
    Petraglia, Michael D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL ARCHAEOLOGY, 2021, 62
  • [6] Earliest Prepared core technology in Eurasia from Nihewan (China): Implications for early human abilities and dispersals in East Asia
    Ma, Dong- Dong
    Pei, Shu- Wen
    Xie, Fei
    Ye, Zhi
    Wang, Fa- Gang
    Xu, Jing- Yue
    Deng, Cheng- Long
    de la Torre, Ignacio
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2024, 121 (11)
  • [7] The Concepts, Chronology and Dispersal Routes of the Initial Upper Paleolithic of South Siberia and Central Asia
    Rybin, E. P.
    Khatsenovich, A. M.
    [J]. VESTNIK SANKT-PETERBURGSKOGO UNIVERSITETA-ISTORIYA, 2023, 68 (04): : 1039 - 1071
  • [8] The Initial Upper Paleolithic of Kamenka site, Zabaikal region (Siberia): A closer look at the blade technology
    Zwyns, N.
    Lbova, L., V
    [J]. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH IN ASIA, 2019, 17 : 24 - 49
  • [9] Human remains from the initial Upper Paleolithic of Ucagizli Cave, South Central Anatolia, and implications for the evolution of the genus Homo in Turkey.
    Güleç, E
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2002, : 79 - 79
  • [10] A Nubian Complex Site from Central Arabia: Implications for Levallois Taxonomy and Human Dispersals during the Upper Pleistocene
    Crassard, Remy
    Hilbert, Yamandu Hieronymus
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (07):