Efficacy and safety of paravertebral blocks in breast surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:270
|
作者
Schnabel, A. [1 ]
Reichl, S. U. [1 ]
Kranke, P. [2 ]
Pogatzki-Zahn, E. M. [1 ]
Zahn, P. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Munster, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Wurzburg, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, D-97080 Wurzburg, Germany
关键词
breast surgery; paravertebral block; postoperative pain; CANCER SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; ANALGESIA; INJECTION; ROPIVACAINE; LEVOBUPIVACAINE; RECONSTRUCTION; THORACOTOMY; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aeq265
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Thoracic paravertebral blocks (PVBs) are successfully performed for pain management after breast surgery. The aim of the present quantitative systematic review was to assess the efficacy and adverse events of PVB in women undergoing breast surgery. The systematic search, data extraction, critical appraisal, and pooled analysis were performed according to the PRISMA statement. The relative risk (RR), mean difference (MD), and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the RevMan((R)) statistical software for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. Pain scores were converted to a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Fifteen randomized controlled trials (published between 1999 and 2009) including 877 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was a significant difference in worst postoperative pain scores between PVB and general anaesthesia (GA) at < 2 h (MD: -2.68; 95% CI: -3.33 to -2.02; P < 0.00001), 2-24 h (MD: -2.34; 95% CI: -2.42 to -1.12; P < 0.00001), and 24-48 h (MD: -1.75; 95% CI: -3.19 to 0.31; P=0.02). Accordingly, lower pain scores were observed for combined PVB with GA compared with GA alone for < 2 h (MD: -1.87; 95% CI: -2.53 to -1.21; P < 0.00001), 2-24 h (MD: -2.21; 95% CI: -3.07 to -1.35; P < 0.00001), and 24-48 h (MD: -1.80; 95% CI: -2.92 to 0.68; P=0.002). The RR for the reported adverse events (e.g. pneumothorax) was low. There is considerable evidence that PVB in addition to GA or alone provide a better postoperative pain control with little adverse effects compared with other analgesic treatment strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:842 / 852
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of paravertebral blocks in breast surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (vol 105, pg 842, 2010)
    Schnabel, A.
    Reichl, S. U.
    Kranke, P.
    Pogatzki-Zahn, E. M.
    Zahn, P. K.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 111 (03) : 522 - 522
  • [2] The efficacy of thoracic paravertebral block for thoracoscopic surgery A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Hu, Zhi
    Liu, Dan
    Wang, Zhi-Zhen
    Wang, Biao
    Dai, Tianyang
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (51)
  • [3] The efficacy and safety of paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in renal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhao, You
    Kan, Yanan
    Huang, Xin
    Wu, Ming
    Luo, Weiping
    Nie, Jun
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [4] Efficacy and safety of paravertebral blocks for breast surgery: A quantitative systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Schnabel, A.
    Reichl, S.
    Pogatzki-Zahn, E.
    Kranke, P.
    Zahn, P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (01) : 24 - 25
  • [5] Efficacy and Safety of Methylprednisolone for Lung Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Fu, Xi
    Ye, Xin
    An, Li-Na
    Jiang, Hua
    Huang, Wen-Bo
    Huang, Ya
    Dong, Jing
    Ren, Yi-Feng
    [J]. PAIN AND THERAPY, 2023, 12 (01) : 165 - 186
  • [6] Efficacy and Safety of Methylprednisolone for Lung Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Xi Fu
    Xin Ye
    Li-Na An
    Hua Jiang
    Wen-Bo Huang
    Ya Huang
    Jing Dong
    Yi-Feng Ren
    [J]. Pain and Therapy, 2023, 12 : 165 - 186
  • [7] The efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in lumbar surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials
    Xiao, Kankan
    Zhuo, Xianglong
    Peng, Xiaozhong
    Wu, Zhenguo
    Li, Bing
    [J]. JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2022, 33 (01): : 57 - 85
  • [8] Efficacy and Safety of Cilostazol for Atherosclerosis: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Wan, Hongbing
    Huang, Tieqiu
    Yang, Pingping
    Wu, Tao
    Zhang, Hongzhou
    Wu, Qinghua
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 79 (03) : 390 - +
  • [9] Efficacy and Safety of Eldecalcitol for Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Liu, Hongyan
    Wang, Guoqi
    Wu, Ting
    Mu, Yiming
    Gu, Weijun
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [10] Efficacy and safety of opioids for osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Avouac, J.
    Gossec, L.
    Dougados, M.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2007, 15 (08) : 957 - 965