The impact of various parameters on the carbon footprint of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden

被引:157
|
作者
Flysjo, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Henriksson, Maria [3 ]
Cederberg, Christel [4 ]
Ledgard, Stewart [5 ]
Englund, Jan-Eric [6 ]
机构
[1] Arla Foods Amba, DK-8260 Viby J, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Agroecol & Environm, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[3] SLU Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Rural Bldg & Anim Husb, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
[4] SIK Swedish Inst Food & Biotechnol, SE-40229 Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] AgResearch Ltd, Ruakura Res Ctr, Hamilton 3123, New Zealand
[6] SLU Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Agr Farming Syst Technol & Prod Qual, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
关键词
CF; Lifecycle assessment; LCA; Milk production; Emission factor; Uncertainties; AGRICULTURAL SOILS;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2011.03.003
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The carbon footprint (CF) of milk production was analysed at the farm gate for two contrasting production systems; an outdoor pasture grazing system in New Zealand (NZ) and a mainly indoor housing system with pronounced use of concentrate feed in Sweden (SE). The method used is based on the conceptual framework of lifecycle assessment (LCA), but only for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. National average data were used to model the dairy system in each country. Collection of inventory data and calculations of emissions were harmonised to the greatest extent possible for the two systems. The calculated CF for 1 kg of energy corrected milk (ECM), including related by-products (surplus calves and culled cows), was 1.00 kg carbon dioxide equivalents (CO(2)e) for NZ and 1.16 kg CO(2)e for SE. Methane from enteric fermentation and nitrous oxide emissions from application of nitrogen (as fertiliser and as excreta dropped directly on the field) were the main contributors to the CF in both countries. The most important parameters to consider when calculating the GHG emissions were dry matter intake (DMI), emission factor (EF) for methane from enteric fermentation, amount of nitrogen applied and EF for direct nitrous oxide emissions from soils. By changing one parameter at a time within 'reasonable' limits (i.e. no extreme values assumed), the impact on the total CF was assessed and showed changes of up to 15%. In addition, the uncertainty in CF estimates due to uncertainty in EF for methane from enteric fermentation and nitrous oxide emissions (from soil and due to ammonia volatilisation) were analysed through Monte Carlo simulation. This resulted in an uncertainty distribution corresponding to 0.60-1.52 kg CO(2)e kg(-1) ECM for NZ and 0.83-1.56 kg CO(2)e kg(-1) ECM for SE (in the prediction interval 2.5-97.5%). Hence, the variation within the systems based on the main EF is relatively large compared with the difference in CF between the countries. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 469
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Carbon footprint of dairy goat milk production in New Zealand
    Robertson, Kimberly
    Symes, Wymond
    Garnham, Malcolm
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2015, 98 (07) : 4279 - 4293
  • [2] How does co-product handling affect the carbon footprint of milk? Case study of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden
    Flysjo, Anna
    Cederberg, Christel
    Henriksson, Maria
    Ledgard, Stewart
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2011, 16 (05): : 420 - 430
  • [3] How does co-product handling affect the carbon footprint of milk? Case study of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden
    Anna Flysjö
    Christel Cederberg
    Maria Henriksson
    Stewart Ledgard
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2011, 16 : 420 - 430
  • [4] CARBON FOOTPRINT OF MILK PRODUCTION
    Jejcic, Viktor
    Al Mansour, Fouad
    [J]. AKTUALNI ZADACI MEHANIZACIJE POLJOPRIVREDE: ZBORNIK RADOVA, 2016, 44 : 459 - 467
  • [5] Sensitivity of the carbon footprint of New Zealand milk to greenhouse gas metrics
    Reisinger, Andy
    Ledgard, Stewart F.
    Falconer, Shelley J.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 81 : 74 - 82
  • [6] Temporal, spatial, and management variability in the carbon footprint of New Zealand milk
    Ledgard, S. F.
    Falconer, S. J.
    Abercrombie, R.
    Philip, G.
    Hill, J. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2020, 103 (01) : 1031 - 1046
  • [7] Product environmental footprint of New Zealand leather production
    Kilic, Eylem
    McLaren, Sarah J.
    Holmes, Geoff
    Fullana-i-Palmer, Pere
    Puig, Rita
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2023, 28 (04): : 349 - 366
  • [8] Product environmental footprint of New Zealand leather production
    Eylem Kılıç
    Sarah J. McLaren
    Geoff Holmes
    Pere Fullana-i-Palmer
    Rita Puig
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2023, 28 : 349 - 366
  • [9] Integrated carbon footprint with cutting parameters for production scheduling
    He, Bin
    Liu, Rongxiao
    Li, Tengyu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 412
  • [10] Carbon footprint of milk production from dairy cows in Australia
    Gollnow, Sebastian
    Lundie, Sven
    Moore, Andrew D.
    McLaren, Jake
    van Buuren, Neil
    Stahle, Peter
    Christie, Karen
    Thylmann, Daniel
    Rehl, Torsten
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL DAIRY JOURNAL, 2014, 37 (01) : 31 - 38