Pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in heart transplant recipients receiving metabolic inhibitors

被引:17
|
作者
Akhlaghi, F
Keogh, AM
McLachlan, AJ
Kaan, A
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Dept Pharm, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] St Vincents Hosp, Heart & Lung Transplant Unit, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
[3] St Vincents Hosp, Victor Chang Res Inst, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1053-2498(00)00234-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Inhibitors of cyclosporine metabolism are commonly co-administered with cyclosporine in transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to compare cyclosporine pharmacokinetics using the conventional formulation (Sandimmune) and after switching to the microemulsion (Neoral) formulation, in stable heart transplant recipients receiving various cyclosporine metabolic inhibitors. Methods: Steady-state blood concentration-time profiles of Sandimmune were studied in 47 transplant recipients receiving either cyclosporine alone (Group A, n = 11) or in combination with diltiazem (120 mg/day, Group B, n = 11), ketoconazole (200 mg/day, Group C, n = 13), or both ketoconazole and diltiazem (200 and 120 mg/day, respectively, Group D, n = 12), and restudied 1 week after switching to Neoral. Results: Neoral resulted in more rapid cyclosporine absorption as judged by the shorter absorption half-lives in all groups (p < 0.05). The mean percentage increase in the values of area-under-the-concentration-time curve was 42% and 37.5% higher for Neoral compared with Sandimmune for Groups A and B, respectively, but only 5.4% higher for Group C and 9.5% higher for Group D. The mean morning trough concentration of cyclosporine was not significantly different after administration of Neoral compared with Sandimmune in any of the groups studied (179 vs 167 <mu>g/liter for Group A; 171 vs 147 mug/liter for Group B; 189 vs 194 mug/liter for Group C; and 181 vs 201 mug/liter for Group D). Neoral did not alter serum concentrations of sodium, potassium, creatinine, and urea in any of the study groups. Conclusions: The faster absorption and improved bioavailability of cyclosporine (around 40%) with Neoral compared with Sandimmune was not seen in patients receiving ketoconazole, where in fact cyclosporine bioavailability was already maximal. Mean morning trough levels of cyclosporine did not reflect the improvement in bioavailability seen in patients switching from Sandimmune to Neoral. Cyclosporine dose adjustment may be needed when switching from Sandimmune to Neoral for patients not receiving sparing agents or who receive diltiazem, but trough levels cannot necessarily be relied upon to determine the degree of adjustment needed. For patients on ketoconazole, the absorption profile is already optimized and no dosage alteration seems necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 438
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CYCLOSPORINE PHARMACOKINETICS IN PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    WANDSTRAT, TL
    SCHROEDER, TJ
    MYRE, SA
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 1989, 11 (05) : 493 - 496
  • [2] Population Pharmacokinetics of Cyclosporine in Transplant Recipients
    Han, Kelong
    Pillai, Venkateswaran C.
    Venkataramanan, Raman
    [J]. AAPS JOURNAL, 2013, 15 (04): : 901 - 912
  • [3] Population Pharmacokinetics of Cyclosporine in Transplant Recipients
    Kelong Han
    Venkateswaran C. Pillai
    Raman Venkataramanan
    [J]. The AAPS Journal, 2013, 15 : 901 - 912
  • [4] CYCLOSPORINE PHARMACOKINETICS IN PANCREAS TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    MUNDA, R
    SCHROEDER, TJ
    PEDERSEN, SA
    CLARDY, CW
    WADHWA, NK
    MYRE, SA
    STEPHENS, GW
    PESCE, AJ
    ALEXANDER, JW
    FIRST, MR
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1988, 20 (02) : 487 - 490
  • [5] INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS IN HEART-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS RECEIVING CYCLOSPORINE AND CORTICOSTEROIDS
    HOFFLIN, JM
    POTASMAN, I
    BALDWIN, JC
    OYER, PE
    STINSON, EB
    REMINGTON, JS
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1987, 106 (02) : 209 - 216
  • [6] HYPERURICEMIA AND GOUT AMONG HEART-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS RECEIVING CYCLOSPORINE
    BURACK, DA
    GRIFFITH, BP
    THOMPSON, ME
    KAHL, LE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 92 (02): : 141 - 146
  • [7] A study of craniofacial growth in infant heart transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine
    Niles, DG
    Rynearson, RD
    Baum, M
    Neufeld, RDW
    Caruso, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 19 (03): : 231 - 239
  • [8] INCREASED INCIDENCE OF CHOLELITHIASIS IN HEART-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS RECEIVING CYCLOSPORINE THERAPY
    SPES, CH
    ANGERMANN, CE
    BEYER, RW
    SCHREINER, J
    LEHNERT, P
    KEMKES, BM
    THEISEN, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART TRANSPLANTATION, 1990, 9 (04): : 404 - 407
  • [9] Rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics in heart transplant recipients administered an antirejection regimen including cyclosporine
    Simonson, SG
    Raza, A
    Martin, PD
    Mitchell, PD
    Jarcho, JA
    Brown, CDA
    Windass, AS
    Schneck, DW
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2004, 76 (02) : 167 - 177
  • [10] CYCLOSPORINE PHARMACOKINETICS IN PANCREAS-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    SCHROEDER, TJ
    MUNDA, R
    PEDERSEN, SA
    CLARDY, CW
    ALEXANDER, JW
    PESCE, AJ
    FIRST, MR
    [J]. DIABETES, 1989, 38 : 252 - 252