Net community benefits and seismic line rehabilitation - a case study

被引:0
|
作者
Cockshell, Dave [1 ]
Langley, Rob [1 ]
机构
[1] Primary Ind & Resources S Australia, Petr & Geothermal Grp, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
关键词
seismic lines; rehabilitation; goal attainment scaling; Innamincka Regional Reserve; petroleum exploration;
D O I
10.1071/EG06197
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
In 1999 the Petroleum Group of Primary Industries and Resources South Australia (PIRSA) conducted an audit of seismic lines in the Cooper Basin of South Australia, to assess their condition upon expiry of Petroleum Exploration Licences (PELs) 5 and 6. A significant number of seismic lines located in gibber plains and residual tablelands to the north of Innamincka were identified as being in poor condition, particularly in regard to active erosion. Detailed assessment of the condition of 1200 km of seismic lines was made wing maps produced from low-level aerial videography. Key stakeholders agreed that physical rehabilitation of windrows or erosional gullies would be unlikely to make a significant improvement to the environmental condition of the lines. This is consistent with other published research on rehabilitation attempts in similar terrains. Rather than wasting money and effort by forcing the licensees (primarily Santos Ltd) to undertake any physical rehabilitation. PIRSA, Santos, and the Department for Environment and Heritage (DEH) agreed that funding of other environmental projects in the Innamincka Regional Reserve would provide a better net benefit to the local environment. The licensees offered to fund projects to a total of $AS60 000 as an offset to undertaking physical rehabilitation. The South Australian Government has accepted this offer. A formal agreement and implementation plan has been developed for the licensees to fund a range of environmental projects within the Innamincka Regional Reserve. In return, the Government agrees hat no further rehabilitation of the lines will be required.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 203
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Case study net benefits
    [J]. Communications International (London), 2000, 27 (10):
  • [2] COSTS AND BENEFITS OF SEISMIC REHABILITATION
    PATECORNELL, ME
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1989, 558 : 392 - 407
  • [3] Rehabilitation of Timber Structures and Seismic Vulnerability: a Case Study
    Parisi, Maria Adelaide
    Riggio, Maria Paola
    Tardini, Chiara
    Piazza, Maurizio
    [J]. 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC CONSTRUCTIONS: STRENGTHENING AND RETROFITTING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2010, 133-134 : 741 - +
  • [4] SENATE BUILDING OF CANADA CASE STUDY: SEISMIC REHABILITATION
    Nicol, Lisa M.
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF HISTORICAL CONSTRUCTIONS (SAHC 2021), 2021, : 156 - 167
  • [5] Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings with Seismic Isolation: A Case Study
    Cardone, Donatello
    Gesualdi, Giuseppe
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2014, 30 (04) : 1619 - 1642
  • [6] Net Metering Benefits for Residential Buildings: A Case Study in Italy
    Sajjad, Intisar A.
    Manganelli, Matteo
    Martirano, Luigi
    Napoli, Roberto
    Chicco, Gianfranco
    Parise, Giuseppe
    [J]. 2015 IEEE 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (IEEE EEEIC 2015), 2015, : 1647 - 1652
  • [7] UCSF Clinical Sciences Building: Seismic Rehabilitation Case Study
    Walters, Mason
    Marusich, Steve
    Sempere, Carlos
    Cooke, Ryan
    [J]. IMPROVING THE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF EXISTING BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES 2015, 2015, : 273 - 286
  • [8] The implementation and evaluation of a community rehabilitation team: a case study
    Ryan-Woolley, B
    Wilson, K
    Caress, A
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 26 (13) : 817 - 826
  • [9] Quantitative assessment of the seismic net-pay method: A case study
    Meza, Ramses G.
    Florez, Juan M.
    Kuzmin, Stanislav
    Castagna, John P.
    [J]. Interpretation-A Journal of Subsurface Characterization, 2015, 3 (02): : B25 - B36
  • [10] Who benefits from treatment and rehabilitation in a stroke unit?: A community-based study
    Jorgensen, HS
    Kammersgaard, LP
    Houth, J
    Nakayama, H
    Raaschou, HO
    Larsen, K
    Hübbe, P
    Olsen, TS
    [J]. STROKE, 2000, 31 (02) : 434 - 439